AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Marketing › October 2026 Edition

Experimentation and personalization

Asked as “website experimentation and personalization platform”, and as “A/B testing and personalization tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
27%
Contested · Convert Experiences 24%
27VWO24Convert Experiences15GrowthBook35others

27% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▼−8Since September 2026: 34% → 26%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.VWO held the lead, −8 points on 34%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01VWO27%11%56accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 34% → 26%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.34% → 26%
02Convert Experiences24%0%33accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 15% → 23%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 23%
03GrowthBook15%8%25accepted challenger▲+11Since September 2026: 2% → 13%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 13%
04Mutiny7%22%18accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 6%
05Optimizely CMS7%47%55criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 9%
06Kameleoon4%0%31accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
07PostHog4%5%19accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Google Optimize Lab in the set0%92%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
11Adobe Target0%58%36criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Dynamic Yield0%38%24criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
08AB Tasty0%13%30accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
09Statsig0%0%14accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Optimize is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01VWO27%
02Convert Experiences24%
03GrowthBook15%
04Mutiny7%
05Optimizely CMS7%
06Kameleoon4%
07PostHog4%
08AB Tasty0%
09Statsig0%
10Dynamic Yield0%
11Adobe Target0%
12Google Optimize0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Optimizely CMS
47%
26 of 55 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“more enterprise-y, pricier ~$36K/yr min, dev-heavy). Avoid if mid-market budget/timeline constrained.” Grok 4.1 Fast, direct prompt
Adobe Target
58%
21 of 36 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Force you into a **closed ecosystem** (Adobe Target unless you're already all-in on Adobe)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Google Optimize
92%
11 of 12 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Google Optimize (the former standard for small-to-mid-size businesses) was sunsetted in late 2023, forcing many users to migrate to other solutions.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, comparative prompt
Dynamic Yield
38%
9 of 24 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Charge **enterprise prices without transparency** (Dynamic Yield, Adobe Target)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1152 links across 297 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Mida37 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Contentsquare33 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Convert31 answers · 50 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Optimizely26 answers · 38 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Guideflow25 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Kameleoon25 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Webflow25 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Personyze23 answers · 24 citations · 11 models
21 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GrowthBook19 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
16 answers · 23 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best website experimentation and personalization platform”, “website experimentation and personalization platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
VWO vwo.com27%15622,20044925,874145
Convert Experiences convert.com24%80502220,8821
GrowthBook growthbook.io15%712,9001426,64626
Optimizely optimizely.com
Optimizely CMS 7%, Optimizely Web Experimentation 4%
11%23760,50036,211200,757 company$21203
Mutiny mutinyhq.com7%71110,0003,0326800
Kameleoon kameleoon.com4%82590328,6013
PostHog posthog.com4%35533,10027125,936120
Personyze personyze.com2%195015360
Mida mida.so2%1649,50018,19733,19032
Croct croct.com2%87

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (guideflow.com, mida.so, optimizely.com). The first result for “best website experimentation and personalization platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best website experimentation and personalization platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which A/B testing and personalization tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top experimentation and personalization platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best website experimentation and personalization platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a website experimentation and personalization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which experimentation and personalization platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5VWO
One alternativeMutiny
against: Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMS, VWOChangedOptimizely CMS
Five alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, HubSpot, Insider, Mutiny
GrowthBook, PostHog
Four alternativesConvertize, HubSpot, OptiMonk, Personizely
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniKameleoon
Two alternativesOptimizely Web Experimentation, VWO Testing
against: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield
VWOChanged
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Optimizely CMS
no first choice
Seven alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, GrowthBook, LaunchDarkly, Optimizely Web Experimentation, Statsig, VWO
Convert Experiences
One alternativeVWO
against: Adobe Target
no first choiceagainst: Google Optimize, Optimizely CMS
Gemini 3.5 FlashVWO
Four alternativesAbmatic AI, Croct, Ploy, PostHog
against: Adobe Target, Intellimize, Mutiny, Ninetailed, Optimizely CMS
MutinyChanged
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, PostHog, VWO
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMS
Six alternativesAdobe Target, Datadog Experiments, Dynamic Yield, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, Statsig
Mida
Five alternativesConvert Experiences, GrowthBook, Humblytics, PostHog, Statsig
against: Google Optimize, VWO
Kameleoon, VWO
Three alternativesGrowthBook, LaunchDarkly, PostHog
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely Web Experimentation
against: Adobe Target, Google Optimize, Intellimize, Mutiny, Optimizely CMS, Webflow Optimize
Perplexity SonarVWO
One alternativePersonyze
against: Amplitude, PostHog
Convert ExperiencesChanged
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Optimizely CMS, VWO
LaunchDarkly, Statsig
Seven alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Amplitude Experiment, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, Optimizely CMS, VWO
GrowthBook
One alternativePostHog
against: Crazy Egg, Unbounce
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastVWO
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Mutiny
against: Optimizely CMS
Convert ExperiencesChanged
Two alternativesAB Tasty, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMS, VWO
Six alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, Statsig
GrowthBook
Five alternativesConvert Experiences, Croct, Matomo, PostHog, VWO
no first choiceagainst: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, Shogun A/B tools, VWO
Mistral SmallOptimizely Web Experimentation, Personyze
One alternativeKameleoon
Convert Experiences, VWOChangedOptimizely CMS
Two alternativesKameleoon, VWO
against: Adobe Target, Google Optimize
Croct
Three alternativesHello Bar, Mida, OptiMonk
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS, Personizely
DeepSeek V4 FlashConvert Experiences, Mutiny
Two alternativesAbmatic AI, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
Convert ExperiencesChanged
Two alternativesMutiny, VWO
against: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS
no first choice
Twelve alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Convert Experiences, Dynamic Yield, Eppo, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, Monetate, Optimizely CMS, Statsig, VWO, Webflow Optimize
GrowthBook
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, PostHog, VWO
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMS
Two alternativesAB Tasty, Kameleoon
against: Dynamic Yield
against: 6sense, Adobe Target, Bombora, Demandbase, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS, RB2B, ZoomInfo
Llama 4 MaverickOptimizely Web Experimentation
Three alternativesHubSpot, Kameleoon, Personyze
Convert ExperiencesChangedKameleoon
Two alternativesAdobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMSPersonizely
Two alternativesMida, Optimizely CMS
nothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashVWO
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Mutiny
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Convert ExperiencesChanged
One alternativeVisual Website Optimizer
against: GrowthBook
no first choiceagainst: Google OptimizePostHog
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, GrowthBook, Plerdy
against: Optimizely CMS
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Target, Contentful, Dynamic Yield, Monetate, Optimizely CMS, Sanity
Kimi K2VWO
Three alternativesIntellimize, Mutiny, PostHog
Convert ExperiencesChanged
One alternativeVWO
against: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Mutiny, Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMS
Five alternativesAB Tasty, Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Kameleoon, VWO
GrowthBook
Four alternativesAmplitude, PostHog, Varify.io, Zoho PageSense
no first choiceagainst: GrowthBook, Optimizely CMSagainst: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Google Optimize, Optimizely CMS
GLM 4.7 FlashXMutiny
Two alternativesAbmatic AI, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
Convert ExperiencesChanged
Two alternativesKameleoon, Mutiny
against: VWO
no first choiceagainst: Google OptimizeVWO
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, PostHog, Zoho PageSense
against: AB Tasty, Optimizely CMS
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS, VWO
MiniMax M2.5Markettailor, VWO
Two alternativesAB Tasty, Mutiny
Convert ExperiencesChanged
Two alternativesPersonyze, VWO
Optimizely CMS
Seven alternativesAB Tasty, Contentsquare, Dynamic Yield, Kameleoon, Monetate, Statsig, VWO
GrowthBook
Four alternativesCrazy Egg, PostHog, Statsig, VWO
against: Google Optimize
Optimizely CMS
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Kameleoon, VWO
against: Adobe Target
against: Dynamic Yield, Google Optimize, Sisense
GPT-6 LunaVWO
One alternativeOptimizely CMS
against: Mutiny
VWOHeld
One alternativeOptimizely CMS
no first choiceConvert Experiences, GrowthBookagainst: VWOno first choiceagainst: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Google Optimize, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Muse Glimmer 30BMutiny, VWO
Three alternativesHubSpot, Kameleoon, Personyze
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Convert ExperiencesChanged
Three alternativesAB Tasty, Kameleoon, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMS
Four alternativesAdobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Kameleoon, VWO – Visual Website Optimizer
GrowthBook
Two alternativesPostHog, Statsig
no first choiceagainst: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield – now Mastercard Dynamic Yield, Google Optimize, Optimizely CMS, SiteSpect
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:17yes189 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:02yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:57yes1632 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:47yes213 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:08yes249 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:08yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:26yes2548 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:47yes51 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:48no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:39yes1841 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:42yes2495 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:02yes1329 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:57yes317 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:37yes1526 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:26no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:43yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:40yes1828 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:09yes243 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:23yes206 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 14:08yes52 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:16yes2130 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:23yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:26yes1232 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:08yes2434 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:44yes1620 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:34yes532 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:51yes213 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 14:05yes1416 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 14:01yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:58yes610 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:54yes2030 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:01yes196 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:52yes248 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:29yes159 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:27yes2338 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:10yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:50no031 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:56yes1423 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:09yes1437 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:57yes1526 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:56yes929 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:33yes1531 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:13yes96 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:50yes56 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:54yes2334 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:34yes203 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:50yes245 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:20yes811 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:31yes2418 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:13yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:05yes2441 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:01yes1020 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:33yes2443 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:26yes1428 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:28yes322 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 13:07yes1419 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:29yes1815 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:11no012 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:22no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:32yes196 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:31yes197 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:56no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:00yes1855 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:38yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:02yes544 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:36yes2437 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:07yes1925 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:29yes1023 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:27yes427 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 14:03yes1522 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:13yes1910 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:37yes45 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:15yes1828 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:16yes205 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:52yes259 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:05yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:41yes2437 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:54yes51 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:15yes2350 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:22yes2524 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:45yes2525 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:58yes2036 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:08yes219 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:54yes2535 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Target
Convert read as Convert Experiences
Convert (Convert Experiences) read as Convert Experiences
Convert (Convert.com) read as Convert Experiences
Convert.com read as Convert Experiences
Convert.com (Convert Experiences) read as Convert Experiences
Salesforce Personalization read as Salesforce Marketing Cloud Personalization
Unresolved, counted raw
Contentsquare Convert
Datadog Experiments
Dynamic Yield – now Mastercard Dynamic Yield
Hello Bar
Rebuy
Salesforce
Shogun A/B tools
VWO Testing
VWO – Visual Website Optimizer
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Event managementInfluencer →