AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Marketing › Experimentation › Small business › October 2026 Edition

Experimentation and personalization for small business buyers

Asked as “website experimentation and personalization platform”, and as “A/B testing and personalization tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 61 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
36%
Contested · Convert Experiences 13%
36VWO13Convert Experiences13GrowthBook38others

36% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▼−2Since September 2026: 38% → 37%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.VWO held the lead, −2 points on 38%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01VWO36%18%61endorsed leader▼−2Since September 2026: 38% → 37%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.38% → 37%
02Convert Experiences13%2%41accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 13% → 10%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 10%
03GrowthBook13%3%34accepted challenger▲+12Since September 2026: 2% → 13%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 13%
04Zoho PageSense10%7%15accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 6% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 10%
05Mutiny5%40%15criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 10% → 6%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 6%
06PostHog3%4%23accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.8% → 4%
07Personyze3%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 4%
08AB Tasty2%29%24criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Adobe Target0%89%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
14Optimizely CMS0%75%55criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
12Dynamic Yield0%56%16criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
11Google Optimize Lab in the set0%50%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Kameleoon0%23%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Statsig0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Optimize is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01VWO36%
02Convert Experiences13%
03GrowthBook13%
04Zoho PageSense10%
05Mutiny5%
06PostHog3%
07Personyze3%
08AB Tasty2%
09Statsig0%
10Kameleoon0%
11Google Optimize0%
12Dynamic Yield0%
13Adobe Target0%
14Optimizely CMS0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Optimizely CMS
75%
41 of 55 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 16 hard negative
“Why avoid it: While Optimizely is a market leader, the "Full Stack" or "Enterprise" versions are designed for large-scale feature flags” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Adobe Target
89%
16 of 18 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“the platforms that are consistently flagged as expensive, complex and overbuilt are the enterprise AI-experience / experimentation suites. ### Enterprise AI experience platforms * **Adobe Target**” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
VWO
18%
11 of 61 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“too expensive for truly tight budgets” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Dynamic Yield
56%
9 of 16 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“entry-level costs start around $40,000 per year... quoted in the $50k-$300k+ per year range” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1100 links across 260 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Convert38 answers · 74 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Contentsquare32 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Kameleoon31 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Webflow31 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Mida28 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ringly.io22 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow22 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GrowthBook19 answers · 40 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Optimizely19 answers · 25 citations · 13 models
19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Croct16 answers · 18 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best website experimentation and personalization platform”, “website experimentation and personalization platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
VWO vwo.com36%15622,20044925,874145
Convert Experiences convert.com13%80502220,8821
GrowthBook growthbook.io13%712,9001426,64626
Zoho parent site
Zoho PageSense 10%
10%262606
Mutiny mutinyhq.com5%71110,0003,0326800
PostHog posthog.com3%35533,10027125,936120
Personyze personyze.com3%195015360
Mida mida.so3%1649,50018,19733,19032
HubSpot hubspot.com2%132368,0009,7762,276,428$83,92276
AB Tasty abtasty.com2%791,0002723,5293

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.croct.com, guideflow.com, mida.so, optimizely.com). The first result for “best website experimentation and personalization platform” is gartner.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best website experimentation and personalization platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which A/B testing and personalization tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top experimentation and personalization platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best website experimentation and personalization platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a website experimentation and personalization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which experimentation and personalization platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Mutiny
Four alternativesClaspo, HubSpot, Markettailor, OptiMonk
against: Optimizely CMS
VWOChanged
Two alternativesConvert Experiences, Google Optimize
VWO
Four alternativesAB Tasty, HubSpot, Mutiny, Nosto
against: Insider, Optimizely CMS
Personyze
Four alternativesGoogle Optimize, HubSpot, Mida, OptiMonk
no first choiceagainst: ABsmartly, Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS, Unbounce, VWO, Zoho PageSense
GPT-5.4 miniVWO
One alternativeOptimizely CMS
VWOHeld
One alternativeOptimizely CMS
against: Adobe Target
GrowthBook
Three alternativesLaunchDarkly, Statsig, VWO Feature Experimentation
against: Optimizely CMS
GrowthBook
One alternativeConvert Experiences
against: Optimizely CMS
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Target
Gemini 3.5 FlashPloy
Three alternativesCroct, Mutiny, VWO
VWOChanged
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, HubSpot Content Hub, RightMessage
against: Mutiny
Varify.io
Six alternativesConvert Experiences, Croct, GrowthBook, PostHog, Statsig, VWO
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Mida
Four alternativesGrowthBook, PageDuel, Personizely, PostHog
against: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Google Optimize, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Convert Experiences, VWO
Six alternativesABConvert, Elevate, GrowthBook, Mida, Statsig, Webflow Optimize
against: Dynamic Yield, Intellimize, Mutiny, Ninetailed, Optimizely CMS
against: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Google Optimize, Kameleoon, LaunchDarkly, Optimizely CMS, Split
Perplexity SonarGrowthBook, VWO
One alternativeConvert Experiences
Convert ExperiencesChanged
Two alternativesPostHog, Zoho PageSense
Statsig
Three alternativesGrowthBook, LaunchDarkly, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
GrowthBook, PostHog
Two alternativesCrazy Egg, Mida
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastVWO
Four alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Omniconvert
against: Optimizely CMS
Convert ExperiencesChanged
One alternativeVWO
against: AB Tasty, GrowthBook, Optimizely CMS, Plerdy
GrowthBook, PostHog
Five alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Kameleoon, Statsig, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
Zoho PageSense
Two alternativesGrowthBook, PostHog
against: Convert Experiences, Optimizely CMS, VWO
AB Tasty, VWO
Two alternativesConvert Experiences, GrowthBook
against: Optimizely CMS
against: AB Tasty, Bloomreach, Nosto, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Mistral SmallMutiny
Two alternativesOptimizely CMS, VWO
Convert Experiences, VWOChanged
One alternativeProof
against: Optimizely CMS
Personyze, VWO Personalize
One alternativeMutiny
against: Optimizely CMS
GrowthBook
Two alternativesConvert Experiences, VWO
against: Google Optimize
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
DeepSeek V4 FlashVWO
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, GrowthBook, Zoho PageSense
VWOHeld
Four alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, GrowthBook, Unbounce
against: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Mutiny, Optimizely CMS
PostHog, VWO
Five alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, GrowthBook, Kameleoon, Statsig
GrowthBook
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, PostHog, VWO
against: AB Tasty, Kameleoon, Optimizely CMS
Plerdy, VWO
Two alternativesAB Tasty, Kameleoon
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
against: AB Tasty, Contentsquare, Kameleoon, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Llama 4 MaverickMutinyagainst: Optimizely CMSno first choiceChangedagainst: Dynamic Yieldno first choiceRightMessagePersonyze
Four alternativesDynamic Yield, Kameleoon, Optimizely CMS, VWO
nothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashVWO
Two alternativesMutiny, Okara AI
against: Optimizely CMS
VWOHeld
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, PostHog, Unbounce
against: Optimizely CMS
VWO
Three alternativesKameleoon, Personyze, PostHog
Mida, Zoho PageSense
One alternativePersonyze
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
VWO
Two alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
against: Adobe Target, Optimizely CMS
Kimi K2VWO
Two alternativesConvert Experiences, Mida
against: Mutiny, Optimizely CMS
Varify.io, Zoho PageSenseChanged
Two alternativesConvert Experiences, GrowthBook
PostHog
Four alternativesConvert Experiences, Crazy Egg, Unbounce, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
Zoho PageSense
Two alternativesGrowthBook, PostHog
against: Google Optimize, Optimizely CMS, VWO
GrowthBook, VWO
Four alternativesConvert Experiences, Kameleoon, Mida, PostHog
against: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely CMS
against: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Kameleoon, Optimizely CMS
GLM 4.7 FlashXAbmatic AI
Four alternativesMida, Mutiny, VWO, Zoho PageSense
VWOChanged
Three alternativesConvert Experiences, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Personyze
Convert Experiences, VWO
Four alternativesAB Tasty, GrowthBook, Personyze, PostHog
against: Kameleoon, Optimizely CMS
Zoho PageSense
Two alternativesGrowthBook, OptiMonk
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Marketo Engage, Optimizely CMS, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, SiteSpect
MiniMax M2.5Convert Experiences, HubSpot, VWO
One alternativeGoogle Optimize
against: Optimizely CMS
no first choiceChangedConvert Experiences, GrowthBook
Three alternativesOmniconvert, PostHog, Varify.io
against: Dynamic Yield, VWO
GrowthBook, PostHog
Four alternativesConvert Experiences, Statsig, VWO, Varify.io
against: Google Optimize
no first choiceagainst: Optimizely CMS, VWO
GPT-6 LunaConvert Experiences
Two alternativesGrowthBook, VWO
against: Mutiny
Zoho PageSenseChanged
One alternativeVWO
PostHog, VWO
Two alternativesGrowthBook, Statsig
against: Optimizely CMS
GrowthBook
One alternativeConvert Experiences
against: PostHog
no first choiceagainst: AB Tasty, Adobe Target, Google Optimize, Optimizely Web Experimentation, VWO
Muse Glimmer 30BVWO
Four alternativesAB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Kameleoon, Unbounce
against: Optimizely CMS
Convert Experiences, VWOChanged
One alternativeZoho PageSense
against: Mutiny
Convert Experiences
Seven alternativesGrowthBook, Intempt, Kameleoon, Plerdy, PostHog, Statsig, VWO
against: Optimizely CMS
Croct
Four alternativesABtesting.ai, GrowthBook, PostHog, Zoho PageSense
against: VWO
Convert Experiences, VWO
Eight alternativesCroct, Eppo, GrowthBook, HubSpot, Kameleoon, LaunchDarkly, Personyze, Statsig
against: Adobe Target, Dynamic Yield, Optimizely Web Experimentation, VWO
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:10yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:19yes24 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:29yes1556 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:40yes183 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:31yes248 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:02yes53 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:05yes2321 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:11yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:49yes17105 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:35yes1922 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:50yes1525 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:40yes517 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:50yes526 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:55yes1415 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:14no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:31yes34 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:50yes2528 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:19yes203 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:29yes239 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:04yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:28yes2229 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:56yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:35no045 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:08yes1532 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:43yes2437 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:01yes545 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:27yes314 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 07:41yes2237 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:02yes1910 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 13:43yes713 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:26yes2335 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:31yes204 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:22yes239 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:25yes107 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:58yes2448 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:59yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:40yes1042 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:06yes2022 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:11yes1870 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:13yes2332 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:27yes521 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:20yes1538 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:45yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:53yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:46yes2424 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:02yes204 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:06yes228 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:59yes155 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:39yes2219 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:20yes51 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:09yes524 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:19yes1928 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 14:15yes2497 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:29yes1322 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:58yes417 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:48yes1422 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:47no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:09no08 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:43yes1028 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:40yes196 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:48yes146 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:18no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:03yes2263 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:03yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:53no029 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:53yes2128 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:55yes1014 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:17no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:13yes321 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:33yes1427 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:38yes188 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:23yes37 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:55yes1421 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:34yes246 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:49yes248 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:27yes56 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:15yes2543 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:20yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:38yes521 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:20yes2423 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:16yes2483 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:04yes2332 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:47yes418 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:01yes1525 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Target
Convert read as Convert Experiences
Convert.com read as Convert Experiences
Convert.com (Convert Experiences) read as Convert Experiences
Convert.com (with Convert Nexus) read as Convert Experiences
Unresolved, counted raw
ABConvert
ABsmartly
ABtesting.ai
Claspo
Okara AI
Optimizelyas lower tiers
PageDuel
PageSense (Zoho)
Proof
Shopify Apps
VWO Feature Experimentation
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Event managementInfluencer →