Every category where a model named Personyze for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	6%	6 of 69	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Personyze yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Personyze across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels4

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Personyze offers the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of use” Mistral Small · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice

“Often highlighted as the best fit for mid-market B2B specifically” MiniMax M2.5 · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice

“likely to be Personizely, Personyze, or VWO” Llama 4 Maverick · Experimentation · direct prompt · first choice

“Personyze is worth considering because it is described as the strongest all-in-one option for mid-market teams” Perplexity Sonar · Experimentation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Personyze, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Personyze was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

VWO13 of 195Not in the top three

Optimizely CMS11 of 191Not in the top three

Convert8 of 194Not in the top three

Adobe Target7 of 190Not in the top three

Mutiny7 of 190Not in the top three

AB Tasty5 of 191Not in the top three

Mida5 of 191Not in the top three

Dynamic Yield5 of 190Not in the top three

PostHog4 of 192Not in the top three

Personizely4 of 191Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Personyze. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 19 answers that named Personyze and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

abmatic.ai1

contentsquare.com1

convert.com1

convertize.com1

coursera.org1

cxl.com1

gartner.com1

growthmethod.com1

learn.g2.com1

mida.so1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Personyze came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

abmatic.ai/blog/top-b2b-personalization-platforms-20261

contentsquare.com/guides/ab-testing/tools1

contentsquare.com/guides/product-experimentation/tools1

convert.com/blog/a-b-testing/ab-testing-tools-for-growth-teams1

convert.com/blog/a-b-testing/top-ab-testing-tools1

convertize.com/ab-testing-tools1

coursera.org/articles/ab-testing-tools1

cxl.com/blog/ab-testing-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Personyze's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Personyze, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at personyze.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.