Every category where a model named Mida for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	11%	2 of 69	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mida yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mida across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained15 labels10

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Pick for Free: Mida is the most generous free option with a true visual editor” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with Mida if you need a no-code solution with generous free tier” Mistral Small · Experimentation · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Pick: Mida.so (Free Forever Tier Up to 100k Monthly Tested Users)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Experimentation · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with Mida's free plan if you have under 100k monthly visitors” MiniMax M2.5 · Experimentation · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mida, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mida was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

VWO25 of 315Compare →

Optimizely CMS23 of 310Not in the top three

GrowthBook22 of 312Not in the top three

AB Tasty15 of 310Not in the top three

Adobe Target15 of 310Not in the top three

PostHog13 of 312Not in the top three

Dynamic Yield12 of 311Not in the top three

Statsig12 of 311Not in the top three

Convert10 of 312Compare →

Mutiny8 of 311Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mida. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 31 answers that named Mida and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mida.soYour site3

amplitude.com2

convert.com2

cxl.com2

geteppo.com2

learn.g2.com2

optibase.io2

qualaroo.com2

statsig.com2

vwo.com2

Eighteen of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Mida came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplitude.com/compare/top-ab-testing-platforms2

convert.com/blog/a-b-testing/ab-testing-tools-for-growth-teams2

cxl.com/blog/ab-testing-tools2

geteppo.com/blog/best-ab-testing-tools2

learn.g2.com/best-a-b-testing-tools2

mida.so/blog/best-ab-testing-tools2

optibase.io/best-ab-testing-platforms2

qualaroo.com/blog/best-ab-testing-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mida

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mida; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mida.so 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mida's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mida, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mida.so is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.