GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Zoho PageSense · September 2026 Edition
Zoho · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Zoho PageSense

17Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Zoho PageSense was named 5 times in Experimentation and 1 other category, where VWO led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In experimentation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zoho PageSense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Experimentation and personalizationMarketing2%13 of 690%3under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34%
Customer intelligence and data scienceGTM data and infrastructure0%89 of 1580%2under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho PageSense yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho PageSense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained8 labels3
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best Recommendation: Zoho PageSense” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Experimentation · budget prompt · first choice
“Runner-Up: Zoho PageSense (Free Forever + $49/mo Enterprise for Full Features)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Experimentation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho PageSense, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho PageSense was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PostHog12 of 173Not in the top three
VWO9 of 173Not in the top three
GrowthBook7 of 171Not in the top three
Google Analytics 46 of 173Not in the top three
Mida6 of 172Not in the top three
Mixpanel6 of 172Not in the top three
Hotjar6 of 170Not in the top three
Statsig6 of 170Not in the top three
Convert4 of 171Not in the top three
Crazy Egg4 of 170Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho PageSense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 17 answers that named Zoho PageSense and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

convert.com2
cxl.com2
geteppo.com2
learn.g2.com2
reddit.com2
amplitude.com1
blog.hubspot.com1
clicksgeek.com1
cometly.com1
compose.co1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Zoho PageSense came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Zoho Office Suite is the company behind Zoho PageSense.
Website
zoho.com
Headquarters
India, India
Founded
1996

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho PageSense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho PageSense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoho.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack