AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Experimentation › GrowthBook vs PostHog
Experimentation and personalization · October 2026 Edition

GrowthBook vs PostHog

Zero of fourteen models named GrowthBook first on the direct prompt; zero named PostHog. GrowthBook was named by twelve of the fourteen models and PostHog by eleven and GrowthBook carries 25 labels and PostHog 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

GrowthBook

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

PostHog

accepted challenger

Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share15%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2519A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, GrowthBook reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.VWO was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. VWO vs GrowthBook · VWO vs PostHog · Convert Experiences vs GrowthBook

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the experimentation and personalization page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GrowthBookFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPostHog
Direct001 against PostHog
Paraphrase001 against GrowthBook
Comparative00
Budget-constrained82
Scale-constrained001 against GrowthBook
Negative20
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where GrowthBook and PostHog stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
GrowthBook PostHog first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GrowthBook on the left and PostHog on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where GrowthBook and PostHog stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashVWO alternatives: Abmatic AI, Croct, Ploy, PostHog
Kimi K2VWO alternatives: Intellimize, Mutiny, PostHog

Neither was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5VWO alternatives: Mutiny
GPT-5.4 miniKameleoon alternatives: Optimizely Web Experimentation, VWO Testing
Perplexity SonarVWO alternatives: Personyze
Grok 4.1 FastVWO alternatives: AB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Mutiny
Mistral SmallOptimizely Web Experimentation, Personyze alternatives: Kameleoon
DeepSeek V4 FlashConvert Experiences, Mutiny alternatives: Abmatic AI, VWO
Llama 4 MaverickOptimizely Web Experimentation alternatives: HubSpot, Kameleoon, Personyze
Qwen 3.7 FlashVWO alternatives: AB Tasty, Convert Experiences, Mutiny
GLM 4.7 FlashXMutiny alternatives: Abmatic AI, VWO
MiniMax M2.5Markettailor, VWO alternatives: AB Tasty, Mutiny
GPT-6 LunaVWO alternatives: Optimizely CMS
Muse Glimmer 30BMutiny, VWO alternatives: HubSpot, Kameleoon, Personyze

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
GrowthBook leads by ten points.
GrowthBook13%#3 of 14
PostHog3%#6 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
GrowthBook leads by eleven points.
GrowthBook15%#3 of 12
PostHog4%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
GrowthBook leads by five points.
GrowthBook5%#5 of 11
PostHog0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about GrowthBook

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“requiring less technical overhead than developer-heavy solutions like GrowthBook” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Open-source, requires more technical setup” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“GrowthBook and PostHog are free to start, and both are open-source so that you can self-host them, making them excellent choices if you want zero upfront costs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The Alternative: If your program is engineering-led, opt for server-side testing or warehouse-native platforms (such as GrowthBook, Eppo, or PostHog)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“GrowthBook is open-source A/B testing and feature-flagging platform, and it is the pick when budget is your tightest constraint.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about PostHog

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.