Digital asset management for small business buyers
Asked as “digital asset management system”, and as “DAM platform”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · Canto 25%
33Filecamp25Canto08ResourceSpace33others
33% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Filecamp held the lead, +3 points on 27%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Filecamp33%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Canto45%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Bynder48%Clear leader▲+16Since September 2026: 33% → 49%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Filecamp33%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketCanto45%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseBynder48%Clear leader▲+16Since September 2026: 33% → 49%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Filecamp33%2%45endorsed leader▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 30%
Filecamp33%2%45endorsed leader▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 30%02Canto25%16%57accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 25%
Canto25%16%57accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 24% → 25%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 25%03
ResourceSpace8%6%16accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%
ResourceSpace8%6%16accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%04
Air6%3%35accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 8%
Air6%3%35accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 7% → 8%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 8%05
Dash6%10%20accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 8%
Dash6%10%20accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 8%06
Dropbox2%31%13criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Dropbox2%31%13criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%07
MediaValet2%30%10criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
MediaValet2%30%10criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08Bynder2%68%40criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Bynder2%68%40criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%94%17criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%94%17criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%14
Acquia DAM0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Acquia DAM0%90%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Brandfolder0%52%29criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
Brandfolder0%52%29criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%12
Google Drive Lab in the set0%33%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Google Drive Lab in the set0%33%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Frontify0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Frontify0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Cloudinary0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Cloudinary0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Pics.io0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Pics.io0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Drive is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Canto vs BrandfolderCanto vs Acquia DAMCanto vs Pics.ioCanto vs AirFilecamp vs BynderFilecamp vs ResourceSpaceFilecamp vs BrandfolderFilecamp vs Acquia DAMFilecamp vs Pics.ioFilecamp vs AirBynder vs ResourceSpaceBynder vs BrandfolderBynder vs Acquia DAMBynder vs Pics.ioBynder vs AirResourceSpace vs BrandfolderResourceSpace vs Acquia DAMResourceSpace vs Pics.ioResourceSpace vs AirBrandfolder vs Acquia DAMBrandfolder vs Pics.ioBrandfolder vs AirAcquia DAM vs Pics.ioAcquia DAM vs AirPics.io vs Air
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112131415Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Filecamp33%
Filecamp33%02Canto25%
Canto25%03ResourceSpace8%
ResourceSpace8%04Air6%
Air6%05Dash6%
Dash6%06Dropbox2%
Dropbox2%07MediaValet2%
MediaValet2%08Bynder2%
Bynder2%09Pics.io0%
Pics.io0%10Cloudinary0%
Cloudinary0%11Frontify0%
Frontify0%12Google Drive0%
Google Drive0%13Brandfolder0%
Brandfolder0%14Acquia DAM0%
Acquia DAM0%15Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Bynder68%
27 of 40 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 12 hard negative
“Mid-Market Tools with Steep Learning Curves (e.g., Bynder) ... Why to Avoid: Users frequently cite a steep learning curve.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Adobe Experience Manager Assets94%
16 of 17 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Avoid bloated enterprise systems (like Adobe Experience Manager or Acquia/Widen) which require massive budgets and dedicated IT departments to maintain.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Acquia DAM90%
9 of 10 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid bloated enterprise systems (like Adobe Experience Manager or Acquia/Widen) which require massive budgets and dedicated IT departments to maintain.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Aprimo100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Built for enterprise scale with complex governance needs; significant implementation costs; overkill for small teams” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 995 links across 155 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Canto46 answers · 71 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Zapier40 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Templafy33 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
30 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Filecamp30 answers · 49 citations · 13 models
30 answers · 49 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Dash30 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cloudinary27 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Brandfolder26 answers · 46 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Frontify26 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra18 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 11 models
37 answers · 12 models
33 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital asset management system”, “digital asset management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filecamp filecamp.com | 33% | 72 | 590 | 0 | 11,252 | 17 | ||
| Canto canto.com | 25% | 145 | 22,200 | 11,609 | 81,784 | 65 | ||
| ResourceSpace resourcespace.com | 8% | 39 | 590 | 5 | 10,427 | 0 | 4 | |
| Air air.inc | 6% | 62 | 201,000 | 1,766,606 | 27,643 | $1,275 | 4 | |
| Dash dash.app | 6% | 25 | 165,000 | 126,123 | 5,694 | 44 | ||
| Masset getmasset.com | 4% | 10 | 1,300 | 3,272 | 943 | |||
| Daminion daminion.net | 2% | 8 | 320 | 1 | 1,021 | |||
| Dropbox dropbox.com | 2% | 34 | 1,220,000 | 18,371 | 2,411,408 | $466 | 101 | |
| Asset Bank | 2% | |||||||
| Brault brault.app | 2% | 3 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (thedigitalprojectmanager.com). The first result for “best digital asset management system” is thedigitalprojectmanager.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best digital asset management system for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DAM platform would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top digital asset management systems for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital asset management system for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a digital asset management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital asset management systems should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Box, Dropboxagainst: BynderCantoChangedCantoDaminionno first choiceagainst: Dropbox, Filecamp, Google Drive
One alternative
Monday.comTwo alternatives
Filecamp, MassetThree alternatives
Air, Daminion, FilecampFour alternatives
Air, Canto, Filecamp, ResourceSpaceGPT-5.4 miniCantoagainst: BynderCantoHeldagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, Google Drive, SharePointFilecampagainst: Acquia DAMDashagainst: Bynderno first choiceagainst: Aprimo
Two alternatives
Brandfolder, FilecampTwo alternatives
Air, FrontifyFour alternatives
Air, Brandfolder, Bynder, CantoOne alternative
CantoGemini 3.5 FlashMassetMassetHeldagainst: Brandfolder, BynderFilecamp, Pics.ioagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, CantoFilecampagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, CantoCantoagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Widenagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Bynder, OpenText MediaBeacon / OpenText DAM
Four alternatives
Canto, Filecamp, Pics.io, Stockpress EssentialThree alternatives
Canto, Dash, Pics.ioThree alternatives
Lingo, Stockpress Essential, Tagbox.ioFour alternatives
Air, Dash, Pics.io, Stockpress EssentialThree alternatives
Air, Dash, LingoPerplexity SonarFilecampCantoChangedFilecampagainst: BynderFilecampagainst: Dashno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Air, CantoThree alternatives
Air, Dash, FilecampFour alternatives
Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary, FrontifyTwo alternatives
Frontify, ResourceSpaceGrok 4.1 FastFilecampFilecampHeldagainst: Air, DashAir, FilecampFilecampagainst: Bynder, Cantono first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Bynder, Canto
Three alternatives
Air, Asset Bank, CantoOne alternative
CantoThree alternatives
Canto, Pics.io, Stockpress EssentialOne alternative
ResourceSpaceMistral SmallCanto, ResourceSpaceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assetsno first choiceChangedCantoAsset Bank, Filecampno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets
One alternative
BoxFour alternatives
Cloudinary, Dash, Filecamp, FrontifyThree alternatives
Canva, Pics.io, Stockpress EssentialDeepSeek V4 FlashFilecampagainst: CantoCantoChangedagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet, WidenAir, Cantoagainst: BynderAiragainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, CantoAiragainst: Brandfolder, Bynderagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, ResourceSpace, Widen
One alternative
Pics.ioTwo alternatives
Air, FilecampTwo alternatives
Brandfolder, FilecampTwo alternatives
Filecamp, ResourceSpaceThree alternatives
Canto, Filecamp, FrontifyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceAirno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM
One alternative
FilecampQwen 3.7 FlashContentHub, MediaValetFilecampChangedagainst: Adobe Experience Manager AssetsBrandfolder, Eagleagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, Dropbox, Google Driveno first choiceagainst: Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDriveno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, Daminion, Hyland
Two alternatives
Brandfolder, CantoTwo alternatives
Bynder Air, Dash Digital Asset ManagementTwo alternatives
CloudStorage.io, FilestageTwo alternatives
Air, FilecampKimi K2Dashagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, CantoDashHeldagainst: Brandfolder, BynderAiragainst: BrandfolderFilecamp, ResourceSpaceno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Frontify, MediaValet
Two alternatives
Air, FilecampTwo alternatives
Canto, FilecampFour alternatives
Canto, Cloudinary, Daminion, Pics.ioOne alternative
DashGLM 4.7 FlashXFilecampCantoChangedagainst: Bynder, FrontifyAir, Canto, FilecampBrault, Filecampagainst: Brandfolder, Bynder, Cantono first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Box, Bynder, Google Drive, OneDrive
Four alternatives
Air, Brandfolder, Canto, DashOne alternative
MassetFour alternatives
Brandfolder, Bynder, Cloudinary, MediaValetOne alternative
ResourceSpaceMiniMax M2.5Bynder, Cantoagainst: Adobe Experience Manager AssetsCantoChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo
Two alternatives
AssetBank, WidenThree alternatives
Air, Daminion, PlytixFive alternatives
Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Cloudinary, FrontifyGPT-6 LunaFilecampFilecampHeldFilecampResourceSpaceno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Cloudinary, Drive, Dropbox
Three alternatives
Air, Canto, CloudinaryOne alternative
CantoFour alternatives
Air, Canto, Dash, Pics.ioTwo alternatives
Cloudinary, DashMuse Glimmer 30BCanto, FilecampCantoChangedagainst: BrandfolderCantoagainst: BynderFilecamp, ResourceSpaceno first choiceagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, MediaValet
Two alternatives
Air, BrandfolderOne alternative
FilecampThree alternatives
Air, Dash, FilecampFive alternatives
Asset Bank, Canto, Frontify, Phraseanet, PimcoreBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:16 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 8 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 14:10 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:17 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 21 | 110 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:48 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 19 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:14 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:44 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:19 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:13 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 23 | 92 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 15 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 21 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:54 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:48 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 18 | 22 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:55 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:47 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:39 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:07 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:51 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 17 | 45 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:26 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:53 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:46 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:00 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:43 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 19 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 14:05 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 10 | 214 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 14:03 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 3 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 14:02 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 22 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:21 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 13 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 22 | 79 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acquia read as Acquia DAM
Adobe AEM read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
OpenText read as OpenText Media Management
Unresolved, counted raw
AssetBank
Bynder Air
CloudStorage.io
Cloudinary DAM
Dash Digital Asset Management
Digizuite
Eagle
Entermedia
Fast.io
Hyland
Microsoft One Drive
Monday.com DAM
MyDesigns
OpenText MediaBeacon / OpenText DAM
Pic.io
Rajuna
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.