Every category where a model named Google Drive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	0%	67 of 68	67%	6	under 10 labels · led by Canto at 34%
Video marketing and hosting	Marketing	0%	55 of 56	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wistia at 56%
Contract lifecycle management and e-signature	Revenue operations	0%	56 of 65	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 25%
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	54 of 59	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%
Knowledge base and self-service	Customer	0%	85 of 96	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Notion at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Drive yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Drive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	4	4
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative31 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“### 3. Generic Cloud Storage (Google Drive, Dropbox) ... they are dangerous for public-facing marketing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video hosting · negative prompt · hard negative

“It has poor public embed experience, making it less suitable for website presentation.” Llama 4 Maverick · Video hosting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Why avoid: Similar to Dropbox, it is built for collaboration, not security.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

“Basic Dropbox, Google Drive, or shared network drives used as makeshift DAMs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DAM · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Drive, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Drive was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dropbox23 of 380Not in the top three

Wistia13 of 383Not in the top three

Vimeo13 of 381Not in the top three

YouTube13 of 380Not in the top three

Vidyard12 of 380Not in the top three

Gumlet10 of 381Not in the top three

SharePoint10 of 380Not in the top three

Bynder9 of 382Not in the top three

SproutVideo9 of 380Not in the top three

Canto8 of 383Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Drive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 38 answers that named Google Drive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apollotechnical.com2

dacast.com2

daminion.net2

gumlet.com2

lingoapp.com2

moonb.io2

resourcespace.com2

swarmify.com2

uscreen.tv2

aprimo.com1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Google Drive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

apollotechnical.com/video-hosting-platforms-for-businesses-compared2

dacast.com/blog/video-hosting-for-business2

daminion.net/articles/tools/dam-software2

gumlet.com/learn/best-private-video-hosting-businesses2

gumlet.com/learn/top-business-video-hosting-platforms2

moonb.io/blog/top-video-hosting-platforms2

swarmify.com/blog/best-video-hosting-platforms2

swarmify.com/blog/free-video-hosting2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Google Drive

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Google Drive; a claim can dispute any of them.

Google Drive (General) 1Google Drive/Dropbox 1

The company

Google Search is the company behind Google Drive.

Website: google.com
Headquarters: United States
Founded: 1997

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Drive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Drive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.