GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Wistia · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Wistia

212Judge labels
75First choices
33Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
56% in Video hosting for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 56 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
12 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 68 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In video hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wistia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video marketing and hostingMarketing56%1 of 5612%68endorsed leader
Video advertisingMarketing0%24 of 12114%7under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wistia yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wistia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.523106
GPT-5.4 mini30115
Gemini 3.5 Flash50117
Perplexity Sonar41005
Grok 4.1 Fast41027
Mistral Small42017
DeepSeek V4 Flash50117
Llama 4 Maverick40217
Qwen 3.7 Flash41117
Kimi K232005
GLM 4.7 FlashX41005
MiniMax M2.532117

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct45 labels32
Paraphrase34 labels22
Comparative38 labels34not counted in share
Budget-constrained35 labels6
Scale-constrained29 labels15
Negative31 labels10not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative212 labels in all, every segment counted; 75 of the 119 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall for Marketing-Driven B2B ... for most mid-market B2B companies, Wistia provides the most comprehensive marketing automation and lead generation capabilities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video hosting · direct prompt · first choice
“1. Wistia - Best for Marketing-Led Lead Generation ... Wistia provides superior marketing automation capabilities for teams with larger budgets.” Mistral Small · Video hosting · direct prompt · first choice
“Wistia – Best for Lead Generation & Marketing Automation ... Wistia or Vimeo for conversion-focused videos on your own site” Kimi K2 · Video hosting · comparative prompt · first choice
“Start with Wistia's free plan ... it's the one true *marketing* platform, with lead-capture forms and CRM integrations built in.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video hosting · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“hosting tools (Vidyard/Wistia) are for owned video, not paid ads” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video ads · direct prompt · hard negative
“Wistia (with major caveats)... Per-video pricing model becomes extremely expensive... still considered one of the better options” Mistral Small · Video hosting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent for leads/CRM but per-seat or per-video pricing explodes at scale (e.g., Wistia: $0.25/extra video)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video hosting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Wistia recently hiked its prices significantly ... it is likely overkill for a startup budget.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video hosting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wistia, over the 210 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wistia was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vimeo186 of 21014Not in the top three
YouTube109 of 21018Compare →
Brightcove106 of 21011Not in the top three
Gumlet73 of 2106Not in the top three
SproutVideo55 of 2100Not in the top three
Kaltura44 of 2104Not in the top three
Bunny Stream22 of 2101Not in the top three
Loom20 of 2100Not in the top three
Dailymotion18 of 2100Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wistia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 210 answers that named Wistia and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

swarmify.com20
apollotechnical.com18
gumlet.com18
vidyard.com17
goldcast.io16
wistia.comYour site16
fast.io15
knowlify.com15
dacast.com13
guideflow.com13

145 of the 161 domain citations in answers naming Wistia came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wistia

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wistia; a claim can dispute any of them.
Wistia Free 2

The company

Wistia.
Website
wistia.com
Headquarters
Cambridge, United States
Founded
2006
Employees
about 87

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wistia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wistia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wistia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.