AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Video hosting › Wistia vs SproutVideo
Video marketing and hosting · October 2026 Edition

Wistia vs SproutVideo

Twelve of fourteen models named Wistia first on the direct prompt; zero named SproutVideo. Wistia was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and SproutVideo by twelve and Wistia carries 74 labels and SproutVideo 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Wistia

endorsed leader

Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in three categories this edition.

SproutVideo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share51%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 7; printed, not drawn.
Labels7417A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Wistia reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Vidyard was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Wistia vs YouTube · Wistia vs Vidyard · Wistia vs Vimeo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video marketing and hosting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
WistiaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSproutVideo
Direct120
Paraphrase90
Comparative100
Budget-constrained415 against Wistia
Scale-constrained501 against SproutVideo
Negative801 against Wistia
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Wistia and SproutVideo were named in the same answer fifty-eight times, of the 231 answers naming Wistia and the 58 naming SproutVideo. In those answers SproutVideo took the first choice two times and Wistia thirty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Wistia and SproutVideo stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Wistia SproutVideo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Wistia on the left and SproutVideo on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Wistia and SproutVideo stood in it.

Wistia first, SproutVideo not the choice

12 of 14 modelsSproutVideo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Wistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
GPT-5.4 miniWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Gemini 3.5 FlashWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Perplexity SonarWistia alternatives: Goldcast, Vidyard, Vimeo
Grok 4.1 FastWistia alternatives: Vidyard
Mistral SmallGoldcast, Wistia alternatives: Gumlet
DeepSeek V4 FlashWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
Qwen 3.7 FlashWistia alternatives: Cinema8, Goldcast
Kimi K2Wistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
GLM 4.7 FlashXWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo
GPT-6 LunaWistia alternatives: Vidyard, Vimeo, YouTube
Muse Glimmer 30BWistia alternatives: Vidyard

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Llama 4 MaverickGoldcast alternatives: Cinema8, Gumlet, Wistia

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
MiniMax M2.5Cinema8, Goldcast alternatives: Gumlet

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Wistia leads by fifty-five points.
Wistia55%#1 of 6
SproutVideo0%#6 of 6
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Wistia leads by forty-nine points.
Wistia51%#1 of 7
SproutVideo2%#5 of 7
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Wistia leads by thirty-two points.
Wistia32%#1 of 7
SproutVideo0%#6 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Wistia

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“gives you a cleaner embed and better analytics than YouTube, but the free plan is tightly limited” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Wistia starts at $79/mo for marketing features, so it's usually too steep for a limited budget.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“it often exceeds the "limited budget" cap for early-stage companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Built specifically for marketing\u2014features like Turnstile email collector... Ideal for: Businesses focused on converting viewers into leads” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Wistia | Marketers who want deep analytics & lead‑gen tools | CTA overlays, email gating, heatmaps, clean embed, strong SEO” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with YouTube (if cost is the primary concern) or Wistia (if you need marketing-specific features)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about SproutVideo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Fewer advanced marketing features (no built‑in CTA overlays)” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Best budget-friendly marketing hosting: SproutVideo” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“SproutVideo currently lists a plan at $12/month billed annually with marketing features, though check storage and bandwidth limits” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · alternative
“If you want strong performance and better value at scale with solid marketing features, SproutVideo is underappreciated.” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.