| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video marketing and hosting | Marketing | 0% | 54 of 56 | 80% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Wistia at 56% |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 159 of 159 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why avoid as primary: Algorithm-dependent reach (throttled without ads), strict content policies risking bans/suspensions” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video hosting · negative prompt · hard negative
“### 2. Social Media Feeds (Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn) ... avoid embedding” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video hosting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), and LinkedIn offer discovery but don't provide a direct, portable relationship with your audience” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Content marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“privacy and data-use risks across major services, including YouTube, TikTok, Twitch, Snapchat, X, Meta” GPT-5.4 mini · Video hosting · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 20 answers that named TikTok and are not a share of its labels.
Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming TikTok came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TikTok's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TikTok, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tiktok.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.