GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Vidyard · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Vidyard

162Judge labels
20First choices
30Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Video hosting for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 56 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 53 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In video hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Vidyard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video marketing and hostingMarketing16%2 of 5615%53accepted challenger
Video advertisingMarketing0%28 of 12117%6under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 24%
Digital sales roomsSales0%51 of 5950%2under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vidyard yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vidyard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini03014
Gemini 3.5 Flash23016
Perplexity Sonar03014
Grok 4.1 Fast14027
Mistral Small21115
DeepSeek V4 Flash13116
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash15208
Kimi K212014
GLM 4.7 FlashX03115
MiniMax M2.513217

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct39 labels7
Paraphrase27 labels7
Comparative35 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained24 labels6
Negative24 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative162 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Vidyard offers the best balance of sales enablement features and reasonable pricing” Mistral Small · Video hosting · direct prompt · first choice
“If your primary goal is empowering your sales development reps ... Vidyard is the superior tool.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video hosting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one platform for a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd lean toward Vidyard” Kimi K2 · Video hosting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Start with Vidyard if your sales team is actively using video to close deals.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video hosting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“don't buy it as your digital sales room platform. The DSR capabilities are too basic to justify the price.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative
“hosting tools (Vidyard/Wistia) are for owned video, not paid ads” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video ads · direct prompt · hard negative
“enterprise-tier Vidyard or Wistia are incredible tools. However, small-to-mid-sized businesses should be highly cautious of their pricing structures.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video hosting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Vidyard/Wistia (entry plans): Excellent for leads/CRM but per-seat or per-video pricing explodes at scale” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video hosting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vidyard, over the 161 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vidyard was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wistia155 of 16185Compare →
Vimeo139 of 16116Not in the top three
Brightcove86 of 1617Not in the top three
Gumlet63 of 16110Not in the top three
SproutVideo45 of 1611Not in the top three
Kaltura37 of 1614Not in the top three
Loom17 of 1610Not in the top three
Dailymotion13 of 1610Not in the top three
Mux13 of 1610Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vidyard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 161 answers that named Vidyard and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wistia.com15
vidyard.comYour site14
apollotechnical.com13
goldcast.io13
fast.io12
gumlet.com12
swarmify.com12
knowlify.com10
dacast.com9
learn.g2.com9

105 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Vidyard came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Vidyard.
Website
vidyard.com
Headquarters
Kitchener, Canada
Founded
2011

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vidyard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vidyard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vidyard.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.