Small business▲+13Since September 2026: 2% → 14%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 2% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 2 pointsRank 6 → 3 of 40
2 categories · RankedVidyard
152Judge labels
27First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Video hosting for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 47 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 50 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Vidyard →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 41
12%45 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 47
15%50 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 48
20%48 labels
accepted challenger
In video hosting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Vidyard for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video marketing and hosting | Marketing | 15% | 3 of 47 | 0% | 50 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 56 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Vidyard held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Video hosting · by segment
Mid-market▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 → 3 of 43
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 19% → 22%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
22%from 19% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 of 45, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video hosting | 16% | 15% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 16% → 15%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 47 |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 56 of 72, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Vidyard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Vidyard across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels7
Paraphrase34 labels14
Comparative36 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels2
Scale-constrained22 labels4
Negative18 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative152 labels in all, every segment counted; 27 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Wistia and Vidyard are the strongest choices when the goal is capturing leads and measuring viewer behavior.” Perplexity Sonar · Video hosting · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best business video hosting and analytics tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be Vidyard or Wistia” Llama 4 Maverick · Video hosting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Wistia or Vidyard are strong\u2014but watch Wistia's overage math and Vidyard's per-seat costs” Kimi K2 · Video hosting · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose a marketing-focused platform like Wistia, Vidyard, Gumlet, or SproutVideo” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Video hosting · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Vidyard, over the 152 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vidyard was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Vidyard, over the 152 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vidyard was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vidyard. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 141 of the 152 answers that named Vidyard and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
gumlet.com76
guideflow.com75
vidyard.comYour site67
swarmify.com59
learn.g2.com55
wistia.com47
dacast.com45
fast.io44
zapier.com37
goldcast.io36
474 of the 541 domain citations in answers naming Vidyard came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
vidyard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Vidyard takes 15% of first choices and Wistia takes 51%.ShowHide
Search and answers
vidyard.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Vidyard takes 15% of first choices and Wistia takes 51%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “video hosting platform for marketing”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best video hosting platform for marketing”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 8,100 a month (“vidyard”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 103 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 248,936 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,806 · 638 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 23,639
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $5 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
15%
rank 3 of 47 in video hosting
Segment leader
51%
Wistia
- First choices
- 27 across its categories
- Named in
- 152 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 141 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on vidyard.com
872
subdomains included
Content
574
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
12 · 27
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 199 | 6 | 2026-09-14 | ABM | |
| News or press | 96 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | Marketing automation, CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 86 | 0 | 2025-11-25 | ||
| Podcast or video | 79 | 0 | 2022-11-30 | SEO | |
| Case study | 58 | 3 | 2026-08-31 | ABM | |
| Conference or event | 21 | 2 | 2026-07-23 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 18 | 3 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | 1 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2022-01-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2021-09-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-14Vidyard brand refresh blog
- 2026-09-09Vidyard vs loom free comparison
- 2026-09-08Video in motion marketing report blog
- 2026-09-03Claim your endless customers offer blog
- 2026-08-31Treering personalized video strategy case study
- 2026-08-19Vidyard vs loom demo comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page vidyard.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Vidyard
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Vidyard.ShowHide
The company
Vidyard.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- vidyard.com
- Headquarters
- Kitchener, Canada
- Founded
- 2011
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- An online video platform for business that helps increase leads, accelerate your pipeline and delight your customers.
- For
- revenue teams; sales, marketing, and customer success professionals
- Price stated
- Free, Starter, Teams, Enterprise vidyard.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $0 vidyard.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Sign up for free vidyard.com
- Integrations claimed
- 51 vidyard.com
- Certifications
- GDPRMicrosoft SSPASOC 2 Type 2
- Customers named
- HubSpot1HuddleCitrixLinkedInDayforceSalesforcemicrosoftGoogle
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Vidyard's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: vidyard.com, vidyard.com/pricing, trust.vidyard.com, vidyard.com/products, vidyard.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vidyard's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vidyard, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Vidyard by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Vidyard is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Vidyard, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Vidyard is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Vidyard is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideVidyard is among the products AI models recommend first in Video marketing and hosting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.