AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Loom · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Loom

31Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Interactive demos for mid-market buyers
Rank 33 of 50 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In interactive demos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Loom for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Interactive demo platformsSales0%33 of 5025%4under 10 labels · led by Storylane at 31%
Video marketing and hostingMarketing0%16 of 470%3under 10 labels · led by Wistia at 51%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Sales coaching and trainingSales0%78 of 1240%1under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Sales enablement and contentSales0%37 of 720%1under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Value selling toolsSales0%58 of 1160%1under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Loom yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Loom across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00202
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01113
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained13 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Loom Free Plan for creating value-focused video demonstrations” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Value selling · budget prompt · alternative
“Consider Loom for sales/customer communication videos” Kimi K2 · Video hosting · budget prompt · alternative
“For simplicity & screen recording → Loom” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Video hosting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Loom for training” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales enablement · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Loom—great for personal outreach and quick walkthroughs, but less focused on structured product tours” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interactive demos · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Loom, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Loom was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vimeo14 of 312Not among the top eight
Wistia13 of 315Not among the top eight
YouTube11 of 314Not among the top eight
Vidyard9 of 313Not among the top eight
HubSpot Sales Hub8 of 315Not among the top eight
Highspot6 of 310Not among the top eight
Supademo5 of 312Not among the top eight
Storylane5 of 311Not among the top eight
Seismic5 of 310Not among the top eight
Navattic4 of 311Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Loom. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 31 answers that named Loom and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com13
guideflow.com10
learn.g2.com10
gumlet.com9
storylane.io7
swarmify.com7
blog.hubspot.com6
cloudtalk.io5
livestorm.co5
softwareadvice.com5

Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming Loom came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

loom.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Loom takes 0% of first choices and Storylane takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “interactive demo platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best interactive demo platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
246,000 a month (“loom”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
33,126 a month

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 33 of 50 in interactive demos
Segment leader
31%
Storylane
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
31 answers
Its own site cited
in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on loom.com
404
subdomains included
Content
27
counted in the table below
Documentation
16
Product · Integration
66 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1202022-05-02
Case study7undated
Comparison3undated
Webinar or virtual event202024-06-27
Report or ebook2undated
Blog1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page loom.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Loom

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Loom.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
loom.com

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
the video messaging platform for work
For
teammates and customers
Price stated
free loom.com
Starting price
$0 loom.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get Loom for free loom.com
Certifications
EBA Compliance
Customers named
MetaLabHubSpotPearsonTypeformSevenSevenSixIntercomQwilrBrushfire
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Loom's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: loom.com, loom.com/pricing, loom.com/use-case/sales, loom.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Loom's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Loom, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Loom by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Loom is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Loom, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at loom.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.