GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Storylane · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Storylane

12Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Storylane was named 3 times in Sales rooms, where Aligned led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business12 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market14 of 59

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 39

under the label threshold

In sales rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Storylane for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	14 of 59	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Storylane yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Storylane across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Storylane offers AI-powered demo-centric sales rooms with a free plan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · alternative

“Flowla or Storylane (Demo-heavy or AI workflows)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales rooms · budget prompt · alternative

“Storylane: Unique AI-powered demo-first approach” Mistral Small · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Storylane, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Storylane was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Aligned11 of 125Not in the top three

Flowla11 of 120Not in the top three

Trumpet11 of 120Not in the top three

GetAccept10 of 121Not in the top three

Dock9 of 120Not in the top three

HummingDeck7 of 124Not in the top three

DealHub7 of 120Not in the top three

Highspot5 of 120Not in the top three

Seismic5 of 120Not in the top three

MindTickle4 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Storylane. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 12 answers that named Storylane and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appcues.com1

apty.ai1

chameleon.io1

devopsconsulting.in1

digital-adoption.com1

gartner.com1

guideflow.com1

howdygo.com1

inlinemanual.com1

jimo.ai1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Storylane came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appcues.com/blog/product-adoption-software-platforms1

apty.ai/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms1

apty.ai/blog/digital-adoption-platforms-failures1

chameleon.io/blog/digital-adoption-platforms1

devopsconsulting.in/blog/top-10-digital-adoption-platforms-features-pros-cons-and-comparis1

digital-adoption.com/dap-comparison1

gartner.com/reviews/market/digital-adoption-platforms1

guideflow.com/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Storylane's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Storylane, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at storylane.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.