27 categories · RankedGuideflow
187Judge labels
19First choices
5Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
27Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Interactive demos for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 116 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Guideflow →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 130
5%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 116
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise17 of 97
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
In value selling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Guideflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value selling tools | Sales | 2% | 11 of 116 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 2% | 13 of 64 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% | |
| App store optimization tools | Marketing | 2% | 14 of 56 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by AppTweak at 39% | |
| Digital adoption and onboarding | Customer | 2% | 11 of 45 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 30% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Interactive demo platforms | Sales | 0% | 13 of 50 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | |
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 0% | 15 of 86 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by LearnUpon at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 0% | 19 of 73 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 34 of 124 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 37 of 123 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 25 of 71 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 47 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13% | |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 25 of 111 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Marketing | 0% | 33 of 68 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Postalytics at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 42 of 82 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% | |
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 0% | 54 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 52 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 67 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Contact center quality assurance | Customer | 0% | 67 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by EvaluAgent at 28% | |
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 53 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Data clean rooms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 69 of 100 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Snowflake Data Clean Rooms at 19% | |
| Direct mail and gifting platforms | Marketing | 0% | 55 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Sendoso at 25% | |
| Event lead capture apps | Marketing | 0% | 53 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23% | |
| Influencer platforms | Marketing | 0% | 46 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Favikon at 23% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 24 of 56 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 65% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 48 of 112 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Retail media platforms | Marketing | 0% | 73 of 121 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon Ads at 33% | |
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 0% | 86 of 130 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Guideflow yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.
By model
How each model treated Guideflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Guideflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 20 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 10 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct34 labels7
Paraphrase23 labels5
Comparative42 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained53 labels6
Scale-constrained26 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative187 labels in all, every segment counted; 19 of the 24 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Guideflow – Recommended for mid-size to enterprise app teams, offering robust keyword research, competitor tracking, and market intelligence.” Mistral Small · App store optimization · direct prompt · first choice
“Guideflow, which has entry-level plans starting at $5 per user per month, making it accessible for small teams with limited budgets.” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Symbe or Guideflow for dedicated value selling” Grok 4.20 · Value selling · direct prompt · first choice
“Guideflow (Best Overall Value)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Digital adoption · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Who to Avoid/Caution: Arcade, Guideflow (for technical deep-dives).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interactive demos · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Guideflow, over the 187 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Guideflow was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Guideflow, over the 187 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Guideflow was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Guideflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 187 of the 187 answers that named Guideflow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.comYour site176
g2.com64
learn.g2.com48
storylane.io42
arcade.software36
supademo.com30
prospeo.io28
us.fitgap.com28
pipeline.zoominfo.com21
syncgtm.com21
318 of the 494 domain citations in answers naming Guideflow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
guideflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Guideflow takes 2% of first choices and Minoa takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
guideflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Guideflow takes 2% of first choices and Minoa takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “value selling tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best value selling tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“guideflow”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 37,574 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 23,614 · 329 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,132
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 116 in value selling
Segment leader
21%
Minoa
- First choices
- 19 across its categories
- Named in
- 187 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 187 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on guideflow.com
20,414
subdomains included
Content
2,382
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
14 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,146 | 83 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 139 | 23 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 38 | 18 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 17 | 11 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 14 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 11 | 6 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 2 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Demand management software blog
- 2026-09-25Learning management systems blog
- 2026-09-25Project documentation software blog
- 2026-09-25Training video software blog
- 2026-09-23Best ai sdr tools blog
- 2026-09-23Best user onboarding software tools blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page guideflow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Guideflow
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Guideflow is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Guideflow is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The most advanced & easy interactive demo platform; Create interactive product demos and step-by-step guides in seconds with Guideflow, the leading AI-powered demo automation tool.
- For
- individuals, startups, growing projects, scaling companies, business needs
- Price stated
- Free guideflow.com
- Starting price
- 0 guideflow.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free guideflow.com
- Integrations claimed
- 3000 guideflow.com
- Certifications
- SOC2 Type IIGDPR compliantCCPA compliant
- Customers named
- AmplitudeGorgiasChartMogulScalewayCaptain DataOneflowForest AdminDocusign
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Guideflow's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: guideflow.com, guideflow.com/pricing, guideflow.com/features/ai, guideflow.com/customers, guideflow.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Guideflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Guideflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Guideflow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Guideflow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Guideflow, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.