AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Walnut · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Walnut

134Judge labels
12First choices
40Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
17% in Interactive demos for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 50 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 49 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Walnut →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In interactive demos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Walnut for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Interactive demo platformsSales2%6 of 5016%49accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Walnut yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Walnut across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501203
GPT-5.4 mini01012
Gemini 3.5 Flash03126
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2002204
Mistral Small02204
DeepSeek V4 Flash02226
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash13015
Kimi K203014
GLM 4.7 FlashX03003
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna01113
Muse Glimmer 30B11103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels8
Paraphrase17 labels1
Comparative29 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels1
Scale-constrained20 labels2
Negative24 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative134 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Walnut if you are an Enterprise sales team with long sales cycles who needs to send a fully customized demo to every specific account.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interactive demos · comparative prompt · first choice
“Walnut is the most commonly cited fit for mid-market and enterprise B2B sales teams that need to personalize demos at volume” Muse Glimmer 30B · Interactive demos · direct prompt · first choice
“Full sandbox personalization with custom pricing | High-fidelity, enterprise-grade sandboxes | Higher price point” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Interactive demos · comparative prompt · alternative
“Walnut - Built for mid-market and enterprise B2B sales teams that need to personalize demos at volume” Llama 4 Maverick · Interactive demos · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms with Known Concerns ... Walnut - High cost barrier: Starts at ~$575/month with no free tier or trial” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Interactive demos · negative prompt · hard negative
“Walnut does not natively support mobile app capturing; it is restricted to web-based products.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interactive demos · negative prompt · hard negative
“Skip premium options like HowdyGo ($159+/mo), Navattic, and Walnut” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Interactive demos · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd avoid Walnut, Reprise, and Demostack if budget is tight” GPT-5.4 mini · Interactive demos · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Walnut, over the 134 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Walnut was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Reprise79 of 13415Not among the top eight
Demostack71 of 1343Not among the top eight
Consensus46 of 1345Not among the top eight
Guideflow27 of 1343Not among the top eight
HowdyGo18 of 1344Not among the top eight
Demoboost13 of 1343Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Walnut. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 132 of the 134 answers that named Walnut and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

storylane.io97
arcade.software92
walnut.ioYour site83
supademo.com80
navattic.com62
howdygo.com52
clevera.ai50
getcontrast.io50
guideflow.com47
demostack.com40

570 of the 653 domain citations in answers naming Walnut came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

walnut.io ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Walnut takes 2% of first choices and Storylane takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “interactive demo platform”
2
Position for “best interactive demo platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
201,000 a month (“walnut”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
96,943 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,096 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,991 · 39 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,487
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 12 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as WALNUT LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 8 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 50 in interactive demos
Segment leader
31%
Storylane
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
134 answers
Its own site cited
in 132 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on walnut.io
1,081
subdomains included
Content
474
counted in the table below
Documentation
485
Product · Integration
19 · 10
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog369202026-09-22CRM, Sales rooms
Report or ebook5902026-03-19
Comparison1922026-09-08Sales rooms, Sales enablement
Glossary or explainer1202025-11-05
Case study902025-10-15
Conference or event2undated
Podcast or video202024-05-02
Webinar or virtual event102023-07-04
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page walnut.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Walnut

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Walnut is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI for Buyer Enablement
For
revenue teams
Price stated
Per month, billed annually; Custom Price; Request a quote walnut.io/pricing
Starting price
575 walnut.io/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IISOC 2
Customers named
Evaluagent
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Walnut's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: walnut.io, walnut.io/pricing, walnut.io/use-cases, walnut.io/customers, walnut.io/personalized-interactive-demos/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Walnut's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Walnut, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Walnut by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Walnut is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Walnut, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at walnut.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.