AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › Interactive demos › Arcade vs Walnut
Interactive demo platforms · October 2026 Edition

Arcade vs Walnut

Zero of fourteen models named Arcade first on the direct prompt; one named Walnut. Both were named by all fourteen models and Arcade carries 48 labels and Walnut 49, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Arcade

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Walnut

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share5%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%16%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4849A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Arcade reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Navattic was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Storylane vs Arcade · Storylane vs Walnut · Navattic vs Arcade

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the interactive demo platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ArcadeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWalnut
Direct011 against Arcade
Paraphrase002 against Walnut
Comparative21
Budget-constrained303 against Walnut
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against Arcade · 3 against Walnut
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Arcade and Walnut were named in the same answer eighty-one times, of the 145 answers naming Arcade and the 134 naming Walnut. In those answers Walnut took the first choice six times and Arcade eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Arcade and Walnut stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Arcade Walnut first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Arcade on the left and Walnut on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Arcade and Walnut stood in it.

Walnut first, Arcade an alternative

1 of 14 modelsArcade was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Muse Glimmer 30BNavattic, Walnut alternatives: Arcade, Demoboost, Storylane

Neither was the first choice, one was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Storylane alternatives: Arcade, Navattic, Supademo, Walnut
Gemini 3.5 FlashStorylane alternatives: Arcade, Demoboost, Navattic
Perplexity SonarStorylane alternatives: Arcade, Demoboost, Guideflow, Navattic
Grok 4.1 FastNavattic alternatives: Storylane, Walnut
Mistral SmallDemoboost, Navattic, Storylane alternatives: Walnut
DeepSeek V4 FlashNavattic alternatives: Demoboost, Storylane, Walnut
Llama 4 MaverickDemoboost alternatives: Navattic, Walnut
Qwen 3.7 FlashStorylane alternatives: Navattic, Walnut
Kimi K2Navattic, Storylane alternatives: Demoboost, Walnut
GLM 4.7 FlashXNavattic alternatives: Storylane, Supademo, Walnut
MiniMax M2.5Navattic alternatives: Storylane, Walnut
GPT-6 LunaStorylane alternatives: Navattic, Reprise, Walnut

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniNavattic alternatives: Consensus, Demostack, Storylane, Supademo

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Arcade leads by twelve points.
Arcade14%#3 of 10
Walnut2%#7 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Arcade leads by four points.
Arcade5%#4 of 9
Walnut2%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Walnut leads at enterprise.
Walnut17%#2 of 9
Arcade0%#8 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Arcade

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Who to Avoid/Caution: Arcade, Guideflow (for technical deep-dives).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“HTML capture is only available on Enterprise plans, so it may feel limited for complex product demos at the mid-market tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“The best interactive demo software in 2026 is Arcade for teams that need fast, visually polished demos with AI-powered production” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For speed and multi-format output: Arcade and Layerpath let you capture once and publish everywhere” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most early-stage teams, Arcade is the top choice due to its free tier and ease of use” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Walnut

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Platforms with Known Concerns ... Walnut - High cost barrier: Starts at ~$575/month with no free tier or trial” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Walnut does not natively support mobile app capturing; it is restricted to web-based products.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Skip premium options like HowdyGo ($159+/mo), Navattic, and Walnut” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Choose Walnut if you are an Enterprise sales team with long sales cycles who needs to send a fully customized demo to every specific account.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Walnut is the most commonly cited fit for mid-market and enterprise B2B sales teams that need to personalize demos at volume” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Full sandbox personalization with custom pricing | High-fidelity, enterprise-grade sandboxes | Higher price point” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.