GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Consensus · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Consensus

9Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Consensus was named 6 times in Sales enablement and 1 other category, where Dock led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business39 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In sales enablement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Consensus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales enablement and content	Sales	0%	21 of 81	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19%
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	42 of 59	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Aligned at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Consensus yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Consensus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other good options include Dock, GTM Buddy, HubSpot Sales Hub, Highspot, trumpet, and Consensus.” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales enablement · direct prompt · alternative

“If you mainly need demos or interactive product selling, consider Consensus.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“its listed starter pricing is much higher than a tight-budget setup, so I would not call it the best budget choice” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales rooms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Consensus, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Consensus was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Highspot8 of 92Not in the top three

Trumpet7 of 91Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub6 of 92Not in the top three

Seismic6 of 92Not in the top three

MindTickle6 of 91Not in the top three

Aligned4 of 92Not in the top three

Allego4 of 90Not in the top three

Dock4 of 90Not in the top three

Showpad4 of 90Not in the top three

DealHub3 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Consensus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 9 answers that named Consensus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com3

g2.com2

capterra.com1

gartner.com1

help.showpad.com1

highspot.com1

mindtickle.com1

seismic.com1

showpad.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Consensus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-sales-enablement-software2

capterra.com/p/141255/Consensus1

capterra.com/p/141255/Consensus/alternatives1

g2.com/categories/sales-enablement1

g2.com/categories/sales-enablement/themes/sales-coaching-and-training1

g2.com/categories/sales-training-and-onboarding1

gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2026-03-09-gartner-sales-survey-finds-67-percent-of1

help.showpad.com/hc/en-us/articles/17807597206930-What-is-Showpad1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Consensus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Consensus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at consensus.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.