Every category where a model named Consensus for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Interactive demo platforms	Sales	0%	12 of 50	12%	17	accepted challenger
Sales enablement and content	Sales	0%	20 of 72	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Digital sales rooms	Sales	0%	34 of 73	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Consensus yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Consensus across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	3	0	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	3	0	0	3
Grok 4.20	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels2

Paraphrase19 labels7

Comparative19 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative26 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative84 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Complex, Multi-Stakeholder Enterprise Sales: Consensus is the premier "presales" automation tool” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Interactive demos · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Choose Consensus if your motion is more about sales-led demo content than click-through product tours.” GPT-5.4 mini · Interactive demos · comparative prompt · alternative

“However, this is better suited if your buying committees are complex with multiple stakeholders.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Interactive demos · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Consensus — best if your company needs a more sales-led demo automation platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Interactive demos · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users report too many clicks for creating demos, making the process time-consuming and inefficient.” Mistral Small · Interactive demos · negative prompt · hard negative

“If your goal is "interactivity," this is not the correct tool.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Interactive demos · negative prompt · hard negative

“If your bottleneck is proposal turnaround and signatures, the proposal-first rooms may not be suitable.” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Consensus, over the 84 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Consensus was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Navattic54 of 8411Not among the top eight

Storylane51 of 848Not among the top eight

Walnut46 of 843Not among the top eight

Arcade42 of 8410Not among the top eight

Supademo39 of 8411Not among the top eight

Reprise37 of 845Not among the top eight

Demostack32 of 841Not among the top eight

Guideflow17 of 841Not among the top eight

Trumpet16 of 843Not among the top eight

Highspot16 of 842Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Consensus. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 84 answers that named Consensus and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com47

arcade.software45

storylane.io44

learn.g2.com40

supademo.com38

walnut.io33

getcontrast.io25

navattic.com24

goconsensus.comYour site22

guideflow.com22

318 of the 340 domain citations in answers naming Consensus came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

arcade.software/post/best-interactive-demo-software-202630

supademo.com/blog/interactive-product-demo-software29

getcontrast.io/learn/interactive-demo-software25

learn.g2.com/best-demo-automation-software24

walnut.io/blog/product-demos/top-interactive-demo-tools-202622

clevera.ai/blog/best-interactive-demo-software19

storylane.io/blog/interactive-demo-software18

syncgtm.com/blog/what-are-the-best-interactive-demo-platforms-for-b2b-sales-enablement18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

goconsensus.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Consensus takes 0% of first choices and Storylane takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “interactive demo platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best interactive demo platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110,000 a month (“consensus”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4,343 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 31,248 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,495 · 158 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,557
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

116 ads · 52 image, 44 text, 20 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2022, as Consensus Sales, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 55 in the year, 61 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 50 in interactive demos

Segment leader

31%

Storylane

First choices: 9 across its categories
Named in: 84 answers
Its own site cited: in 84 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on goconsensus.com

1,908

subdomains included

Content

941

counted in the table below

Documentation

288

Product · Integration

5 · 9

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	608	11	2026-09-28	PRM, ABM
Webinar or virtual event	121	0	2025-11-20	CRM
Report or ebook	68	0	2026-06-30
News or press	47	2	2026-09-22
Case study	34	4	2026-09-24
Comparison	21	2	2026-09-25
Glossary or explainer	21	2	2026-09-22
Podcast or video	10	0	2026-05-11
Conference or event	7	1	2026-07-16
Template or tool	4	0	2025-09-23

Most recent

2026-09-28Sales enablement metrics blog
2026-09-25Conversational ai vs generative ai comparison
2026-09-24How to find the right product demo tools blog
2026-09-24Seismic live case study case study
2026-09-23Conversational ai vs chatbots comparison
2026-09-22Consensus welcomes new cro news or press

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page goconsensus.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Consensus

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Consensus; a claim can dispute any of them.

Consensus (formerly DemoChimp) 1Consensus/trumpet 1

Follow Consensus

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Consensus is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Consensus is the Interactive AI platform that turns every demo into a buying decision — 2x faster.
goconsensus.com
For: GTM teams
goconsensus.com
Price stated: pricing starts at $600/month and offers custom enterprise options goconsensus.com/pricing
Starting price: 600/month goconsensus.com/pricing
Customers named: CoupaLucidHexagonAavenir
Not stated on the pages read: Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Consensus's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: goconsensus.com, goconsensus.com/pricing, goconsensus.com/solutions, goconsensus.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Consensus's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Consensus, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Consensus by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Consensus is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Consensus, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.