AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › LearnWorlds · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

LearnWorlds

83Judge labels
15First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Customer education for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LearnWorlds →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In customer education · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LearnWorlds for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Customer education and LMSCustomer6%4 of 8610%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Community platformsCustomer2%10 of 750%3under 10 labels · led by Bettermode at 29%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, LearnWorlds held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Customer education · by segment

Small business▼−16Since September 2026: 35% → 19%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
19%from 35% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 5 pointsRank 2 of 85, unchanged
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 5 of 81
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 51 → 14 of 45

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Customer education2%4%▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 6 → 4 of 86
Community0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 10 of 75, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated LearnWorlds across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar02013
Grok 4.2001012
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash03104
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.512003
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels3
Paraphrase14 labels2
Comparative20 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labels8
Scale-constrained6 labels2
Negative13 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 27 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or LearnWorlds if you're ready to invest ~$25/month for a more polished, branded academy experience” Kimi K2 · Customer education · budget prompt · first choice
“For tightest budget, start with Discord (free) or LearnWorlds ($29/month).” MiniMax M2.5 · Community · budget prompt · first choice
“choose LearnWorlds Pro Trainer for a branded customer academy with free courses” GPT-6 Luna · Customer education · budget prompt · first choice
“### 1. LearnWorlds Best for: B2B companies with sophisticated needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer education · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“LearnWorlds if you need a strong native CRM, enterprise controls, or live training at the center of the experience.” Perplexity Sonar · Customer education · negative prompt · soft negative
“LearnWorlds gets mixed feedback for strong engagement tools locked behind pricier tiers, plus steeper learning curves.” Grok 4.20 · Customer education · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LearnWorlds, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LearnWorlds was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Docebo31 of 831Not among the top eight
Thought Industries25 of 830Not among the top eight
Teachable21 of 832Not among the top eight
Disco21 of 831Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LearnWorlds. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 83 answers that named LearnWorlds and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learnworlds.comYour site65
dupple.com43
guideflow.com42
continu.com35
easywebinar.com35
minicoursegenerator.com28
knowlify.com26
talentlms.com26
teachfloor.com26
thinkific.com26

287 of the 352 domain citations in answers naming LearnWorlds came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

learnworlds.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LearnWorlds takes 6% of first choices and LearnUpon takes 26%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “customer education platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer education platform”
4
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“learnworlds”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
67 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 27,442 a month
Searches its site ranks for
11,629 · 223 in the top three
Sites linking to it
16,528
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $51 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
93+ ads · 66 text, 23 image, 4 video · 69 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2022, as Learnworlds (CY) Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 67 in the year, 26 before. 27 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 86 in customer education
Segment leader
26%
LearnUpon
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
83 answers
Its own site cited
in 80 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on learnworlds.com
953
subdomains included
Content
686
counted in the table below
Documentation
27
Product · Integration
104 · 10
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog438undatedSEO, Ecommerce
Webinar or virtual event88undatedSEO
Report or ebook49undated
Comparison41undated
Template or tool27undated
Case study24undated
Glossary or explainer6undated
News or press6undated
Conference or event4undated
Podcast or video3undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page learnworlds.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow LearnWorlds

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

LearnWorlds is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The complete LMS software to build, deliver, and scale training programs.
For
learning businesses; course creators; training providers; NGOs & education networks
Price stated
Starter 29 USD; Pro Trainer 79 USD; Learning Center 299 USD learnworlds.com
Starting price
29 learnworlds.com
Free plan or trial
Start free learnworlds.com
Integrations claimed
50 learnworlds.com · 4000 learnworlds.com/product/integrations pages disagree
Certifications
GDPR-compliant
Customers named
ImprovPianoTipsCalisthenicsLearning LiaisonsDrone itnailArtsHacking HRPennylaneKonsultori
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What LearnWorlds's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: learnworlds.com, learnworlds.com/plans, learnworlds.com/product/updates, learnworlds.com/customers, learnworlds.com/product/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LearnWorlds's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LearnWorlds, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LearnWorlds by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where LearnWorlds is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name LearnWorlds, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at learnworlds.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.