GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Gainsight Customer Education · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Gainsight Customer Education

35Judge labels
5First choices
12Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Customer education for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 81 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 14 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In customer education · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Gainsight Customer Education for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Customer education and LMSCustomer5%5 of 8114%14accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gainsight Customer Education yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gainsight Customer Education across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501113
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash12205
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210012
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If I had to pick a default for a mid-market B2B company: Northpass (Gainsight Customer Education)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer education · direct prompt · first choice
“Northpass (Gainsight Customer Education) — *Best Overall for Mid-Market*” Kimi K2 · Customer education · direct prompt · first choice
“Northpass (now part of Gainsight) differentiates itself by living inside the Gainsight customer success ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer education · direct prompt · alternative
“Northpass remains a favorite for mid-market SaaS companies looking for a highly customizable, embeddable academy.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Northpass no longer exists as a standalone product (it became Gainsight Customer Education, and Gainsight has since acquired Skilljar too).” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer education · negative prompt · hard negative
“Weak analytics - "Analytics are simply awful," "no consistency between reports"” Kimi K2 · Customer education · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gainsight Customer Education, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gainsight Customer Education was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Skilljar30 of 3210Not in the top three
Docebo26 of 320Not in the top three
WorkRamp23 of 321Not in the top three
LearnWorlds20 of 327Not in the top three
Thought Industries19 of 320Not in the top three
TalentLMS18 of 325Not in the top three
LearnUpon18 of 321Not in the top three
Intellum11 of 320Not in the top three
Thinkific10 of 323Not in the top three
Absorb LMS9 of 320Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gainsight Customer Education. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 32 answers that named Gainsight Customer Education and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

meltingspot.io5
minicoursegenerator.com5
learnworlds.com3
teachable.com3
teachfloor.com3
appcues.com2
cloudshare.com2
disco.co2
dupple.com2
easywebinar.com2

Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Gainsight Customer Education came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Gainsight Customer Education

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gainsight Customer Education; a claim can dispute any of them.
Northpass 6Northpass (Gainsight Customer Education) 3Northpass (now Gainsight) 1Northpass (now part of Gainsight) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gainsight Customer Education's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gainsight Customer Education, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gainsight.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack