Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 75 → 74 of 85
3 categories · RankedWorkRamp
68Judge labels
3First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Customer education for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 21 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of WorkRamp →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business77 of 89
0%19 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market6 of 86
2%21 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 49
2%21 labels
accepted challenger
In customer education · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WorkRamp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 2% | 6 of 86 | 5% | 21 | accepted challenger | ▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Community platforms | Customer | 0% | 41 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bettermode at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 60 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WorkRamp held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Customer education · by segment
Mid-market▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 7 of 81
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 → 8 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer education | 7% | 2% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 6 of 86 |
| Community | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 75, unchanged |
| Sales coaching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 80 → 60 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WorkRamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WorkRamp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels2
Paraphrase12 labels1
Comparative20 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Skilljar and WorkRamp are the top choices” Mistral Small · Customer education · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“WorkRamp - a multi-functional, all-in-one platform that empowers businesses to develop and deploy engaging customer training programs.” Llama 4 Maverick · Community · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Excellent if you want a platform that can handle *both* internal employee enablement and external customer/partner training” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · scale prompt · alternative
“The "all-in-one learning cloud" that covers internal enablement and external customer education in one system” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“WorkRamp if customer education is your only focus and you need live training or deep customer-specific features” Perplexity Sonar · Customer education · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorkRamp, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkRamp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WorkRamp, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkRamp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkRamp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 68 answers that named WorkRamp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
continu.com33
learnworlds.com33
guideflow.com32
thinkific.com32
teachfloor.com30
minicoursegenerator.com28
dupple.com27
g2.com26
knowlify.com26
easywebinar.com25
292 of the 292 domain citations in answers naming WorkRamp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
workramp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WorkRamp takes 2% of first choices and LearnUpon takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
workramp.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WorkRamp takes 2% of first choices and LearnUpon takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer education platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer education platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“workramp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 34 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 8,841 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,689 · 107 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,160
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 86 in customer education
Segment leader
26%
LearnUpon
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 68 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 68 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on workramp.com
8
subdomains included
Content
1
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page workramp.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as WorkRamp
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WorkRamp; a claim can dispute any of them.
WorkRamp (Customer Academy) 1Workramp 1
Follow WorkRamp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WorkRamp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WorkRamp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered LMS for fast-growing teams
- For
- fast-growing teams
- Certifications
- certificationsvideo and written pitch certifications
- Customers named
- ZappiSprout Social
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What WorkRamp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: workramp.com, trust.workramp.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkRamp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkRamp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WorkRamp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WorkRamp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WorkRamp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.