LearnWorlds vs WorkRamp
Zero of fourteen models named LearnWorlds first on the direct prompt; zero named WorkRamp. LearnWorlds was named by eleven of the fourteen models and WorkRamp by ten and LearnWorlds carries 20 labels and WorkRamp 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Customer education and LMS page.
By framing
LearnWorldsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkRamp
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, LearnWorlds and WorkRamp were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 83 answers naming LearnWorlds and the 68 naming WorkRamp. In those answers WorkRamp took the first choice zero times and LearnWorlds seven.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
LearnWorlds WorkRamp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, LearnWorlds on the left and WorkRamp on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
LearnWorlds18%#2 of 14WorkRamp0%#9 of 14LearnWorlds6%#4 of 11WorkRamp2%#6 of 11LearnWorlds2%#– of 10WorkRamp2%#8 of 10What the models said about LearnWorlds
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“LearnWorlds if you need a strong native CRM, enterprise controls, or live training at the center of the experience.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“LearnWorlds gets mixed feedback for strong engagement tools locked behind pricier tiers, plus steeper learning curves.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“or LearnWorlds if you're ready to invest ~$25/month for a more polished, branded academy experience” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“choose LearnWorlds Pro Trainer for a branded customer academy with free courses” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“### 1. LearnWorlds Best for: B2B companies with sophisticated needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about WorkRamp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“WorkRamp if customer education is your only focus and you need live training or deep customer-specific features” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Skilljar and WorkRamp are the top choices” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Excellent if you want a platform that can handle *both* internal employee enablement and external customer/partner training” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
“The "all-in-one learning cloud" that covers internal enablement and external customer education in one system” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.