Skilljar vs LearnWorlds
Five of twelve models named Skilljar first on the direct prompt; zero named LearnWorlds. Skilljar was named by twelve of the twelve models and LearnWorlds by ten and Skilljar carries 47 labels and LearnWorlds 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Customer education and LMS page.
By framing
SkilljarFirst choices, of twelve modelsLearnWorlds
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Skilljar and LearnWorlds were named in the same answer sixty-six times, of the 140 answers naming Skilljar and the 90 naming LearnWorlds. In those answers LearnWorlds took the first choice twenty times and Skilljar thirteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Skilljar LearnWorlds first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Skilljar on the left and LearnWorlds on the right.The direct prompt
Skilljar first, LearnWorlds an alternative
5 of 12 modelsLearnWorlds was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
LearnWorlds35%#2 of 12Skilljar0%#11 of 12Skilljar17%#3 of 13LearnWorlds2%#6 of 13Skilljar33%#1 of 10LearnWorlds0%#10 of 10What the models said about Skilljar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Enterprise platforms (Skilljar, Thought Industries, Docebo): Start at $25,000+/year” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid expensive enterprise-only tools like Gainsight/Skilljar-style platforms” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise tools (Skilljar, Docebo, LearnUpon, Thought Industries)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Skilljar is one of the most established names in customer education... is a top choice for B2B SaaS companies with dedicated customer education teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Historically the undisputed "gold standard" for external B2B training... 👉 Choose Skilljar. Its integration depth ... are unmatched.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Skilljar, WorkRamp, or Northpass (if using Gainsight) would be the strongest choices” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about LearnWorlds
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For the best overall value: LearnWorlds at $24-29/month offers the most features for the price” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“SMB-friendly starting at $24-29/month, modern UX, good e-commerce features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“LearnWorlds ($24-299/month) - Good balance of features and price” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.