Every category where a model named Intellum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer education and LMS	Customer	0%	17 of 81	23%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Intellum yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Intellum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels1

Paraphrase11 labels5

Comparative15 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A highly powerful, enterprise-grade platform used by companies like Google and Meta.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · scale prompt · alternative

“It is the platform of choice for tech giants like Google and Meta.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative

“Advanced gamification, social learning, enterprise depth” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative

“Other options include Beetsol, LearnUpon, and Intellum” Llama 4 Maverick · Customer education · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms with Significant Red Flags ... 1. Intellum ... Poor search functionality” Kimi K2 · Customer education · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid if quick setup or intuitive navigation is key.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Customer education · negative prompt · hard negative

“Enterprise platforms such as Skilljar, Docebo, and Intellum often start at $50,000+ annually” Perplexity Sonar · Customer education · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intellum, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intellum was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skilljar46 of 5218Not in the top three

Docebo45 of 524Not in the top three

Thought Industries42 of 521Not in the top three

LearnUpon32 of 524Not in the top three

Absorb LMS24 of 521Not in the top three

LearnWorlds21 of 522Not in the top three

TalentLMS20 of 525Not in the top three

WorkRamp20 of 521Not in the top three

Teachfloor12 of 521Not in the top three

Gainsight Customer Education11 of 522Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intellum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 52 answers that named Intellum and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

easywebinar.com5

learnworlds.com5

meltingspot.io5

minicoursegenerator.com5

teachfloor.com5

thinkific.com5

intellum.comYour site4

360learning.com3

continu.com3

dupple.com3

Thirty-nine of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Intellum came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

easywebinar.com/blog/customer-education-platform5

meltingspot.io/en/blog/top-customer-education-platforms5

minicoursegenerator.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms5

teachfloor.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms5

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms4

thinkific.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms4

dupple.com/learn/best-customer-education-platforms3

ewebinar.com/blog/best-lms-for-customer-training3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intellum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intellum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intellum.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.