Every category where a model named LearnUpon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer education and LMS	Customer	21%	2 of 81	5%	43	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LearnUpon yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LearnUpon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	2	1	0	4
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	2	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	4	1	0	5
Mistral Small	1	2	2	0	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	1	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	3	1	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels3

Paraphrase17 labels5

Comparative26 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained13 labels2

Negative16 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative97 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“my default recommendation would be LearnUpon if your main goal is customer training / extended enterprise learning” GPT-5.4 mini · Customer education · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“A very popular mid-market choice with excellent multi-tenant "portal" features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · scale prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend LearnUpon as the safest all-around choice” Perplexity Sonar · Customer education · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I recommend LearnUpon as the best overall choice” Mistral Small · Customer education · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid enterprise tools (Skilljar, Docebo, LearnUpon, Thought Industries)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer education · budget prompt · hard negative

“No native content authoring ... Per-portal pricing adds up” Kimi K2 · Customer education · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LearnUpon, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LearnUpon was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Skilljar78 of 9729Compare →

Docebo72 of 976Not in the top three

TalentLMS59 of 9717Compare →

Thought Industries57 of 972Not in the top three

Absorb LMS45 of 970Not in the top three

WorkRamp42 of 972Not in the top three

LearnWorlds40 of 9710Not in the top three

Intellum32 of 973Not in the top three

Teachfloor23 of 971Not in the top three

Thinkific20 of 973Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LearnUpon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 97 answers that named LearnUpon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com10

docebo.com9

minicoursegenerator.com8

meltingspot.io7

teachfloor.com7

disco.co6

easywebinar.com6

guideflow.com6

learnworlds.com6

dupple.com5

Seventy of the seventy domain citations in answers naming LearnUpon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

minicoursegenerator.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms8

meltingspot.io/en/blog/top-customer-education-platforms7

teachfloor.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms7

easywebinar.com/blog/customer-education-platform6

guideflow.com/blog/customer-training-software6

disco.co/blog/top-customer-education-platforms-compared5

dupple.com/learn/best-customer-education-platforms5

g2.com/categories/customer-education5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LearnUpon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LearnUpon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at learnupon.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.