| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 2% | 9 of 86 | 35% | 46 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 36 of 124 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 62 of 72 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer education | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 9 of 86 |
| Sales coaching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 36 of 124 |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 72, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with demos from 3-4 (e.g., Skilljar, Docebo, TalentLMS)” Grok 4.20 · Customer education · scale prompt · first choice
“Docebo is a learning management system enabling customer educators to deliver, manage, and scale personalized learning experiences” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative
“Docebo if you're consolidating internal employee training and external customer training on a broader LMS” GPT-6 Luna · Customer education · direct prompt · alternative
“Choose Docebo, Litmos, or TalentLMS if you want a more general LMS with customer-training support” Perplexity Sonar · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Docebo — Highest Caution for SMBs ... "overkill that will eat your budget alive"” Kimi K2 · Customer education · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms (Skilljar, Docebo, Thought Industries, LearnUpon)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer education · budget prompt · hard negative
“Overkill for a limited budget” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer education · budget prompt · hard negative
“Many enterprise-focused platforms (e.g., Skilljar, Docebo) don't publish pricing. This can lead to budget surprises later.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer education · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 136 of the 144 answers that named Docebo and are not a share of its labels.
471 of the 517 domain citations in answers naming Docebo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 420 | 11 | 2026-09-22 | CRM, Customer education | |
| News or press | 269 | 0 | 2026-04-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 212 | 3 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Case study | 57 | 4 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Comparison | 56 | 2 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Conference or event | 41 | 0 | 2024-11-26 | ||
| Template or tool | 26 | 0 | 2025-08-05 | ||
| Report or ebook | 25 | 0 | 2026-04-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2023-01-06 |
As the event pages on docebo.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page docebo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What Docebo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: docebo.com, docebo.com/pricing, trust.docebo.com, docebo.com/solutions, docebo.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Docebo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Docebo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Docebo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: