Every category where a model named Absorb LMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer education and LMS	Customer	2%	7 of 81	0%	27	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Absorb LMS yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Absorb LMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	0	3
Mistral Small	0	2	2	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase15 labels1

Comparative25 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Absorb LMS (Best Overall for SaaS & Service Companies)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer education · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best if you want strong learner experience and branded customer portals, and can handle a bit more setup: Absorb LMS” GPT-5.4 mini · Customer education · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for: Teams looking for automated administrative workflows and native course-authoring features.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · comparative prompt · alternative

“Known for a great UI/UX and solid external-facing features without the massive enterprise price tags” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Absorb LMS, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Absorb LMS was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo46 of 595Not in the top three

LearnUpon45 of 597Not in the top three

Skilljar43 of 5923Not in the top three

Thought Industries37 of 593Not in the top three

TalentLMS35 of 595Not in the top three

Intellum24 of 594Not in the top three

LearnWorlds23 of 592Not in the top three

WorkRamp22 of 591Not in the top three

Teachfloor16 of 590Not in the top three

Thinkific12 of 590Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Absorb LMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 59 answers that named Absorb LMS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com8

docebo.com7

meltingspot.io4

minicoursegenerator.com4

teachfloor.com4

thinkific.com4

360learning.com3

continu.com3

easywebinar.com3

intellum.com3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Absorb LMS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

meltingspot.io/en/blog/top-customer-education-platforms4

minicoursegenerator.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms4

teachfloor.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms4

easywebinar.com/blog/customer-education-platform3

g2.com/categories/customer-education3

g2.com/categories/customer-education/enterprise3

intellum.com/resources/blog/best-enterprise-lms-platforms3

knowlify.com/articles/best-customer-training-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Absorb LMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Absorb LMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at absorblms.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.