Every category where a model named Teachable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer education and LMS	Customer	0%	79 of 81	43%	7	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Teachable yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Teachable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Teachable/Thinkific if your content is video-heavy” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Customer education · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid - Teachable: Removed free plan in 2025; Starter plan has 7.5% transaction fees” Kimi K2 · Customer education · budget prompt · hard negative

“Platforms to Avoid for B2B Customer Ed: Kajabi, Teachable” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Customer education · negative prompt · hard negative

“makes it a high-risk choice” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Customer education · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Teachable, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teachable was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo22 of 292Not in the top three

Skilljar21 of 294Not in the top three

Thinkific17 of 292Not in the top three

Thought Industries12 of 291Not in the top three

LearnWorlds11 of 293Not in the top three

TalentLMS11 of 293Not in the top three

Kajabi10 of 290Not in the top three

WorkRamp10 of 290Not in the top three

Gainsight Customer Education8 of 291Not in the top three

LearnUpon8 of 291Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teachable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 29 answers that named Teachable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

meltingspot.io2

minicoursegenerator.com2

360learning.com1

absorbai.com1

app-learning.com1

appcues.com1

cloudshare.com1

customerhub.com1

d2l.com1

disco.co1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Teachable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

meltingspot.io/en/blog/top-customer-education-platforms2

minicoursegenerator.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms2

360learning.com/blog/lms-pricing1

absorbai.com/blog/the-essential-guide-to-lms-pricing1

app-learning.com/blog/best-customer-education-platforms1

appcues.com/blog/customer-training-software1

cloudshare.com/blog/best-customer-education-software1

customerhub.com/post/e-learning-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Teachable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Teachable; a claim can dispute any of them.

Teachable Business 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teachable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teachable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at teachable.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.