Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 74 → 73 of 75
Microsoft · 4 categories · RankedSharePoint
51Judge labels
3First choices
21Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Knowledge base for enterprise buyers
Rank 86 of 88 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 60% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business75 of 77
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market86 of 88
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 85
4%24 labels
accepted challenger
In knowledge base · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SharePoint for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge base and self-service | Customer | 0% | 86 of 88 | 60% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Notion at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 0% | 58 of 70 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Canto at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 71 of 72 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 61 of 63 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 23% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SharePoint held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Knowledge base · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 88 → 85 of 85
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 28 → 5 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge base | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 88 → 86 of 88 |
| DAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 58 of 70 |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 72, unchanged |
| CLM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 60 → 61 of 63 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SharePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SharePoint across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative12 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative21 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Try configuring SharePoint first; if it proves too difficult to manage, move to Filestage.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Major risks: Scalability fails, security gaps, delayed time-to-value” Grok 4.20 · CLM · negative prompt · hard negative
“standard cloud storage is a graveyard for sales content” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“generic SharePoint-based or file-share solutions repackaged as enablement tools... No version control, expiration, or governance; content becomes stale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales enablement · negative prompt · soft negative
“You've likely outgrown basic cloud storage (like Google Drive, Sharepoint, or Dropbox)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SharePoint, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SharePoint was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SharePoint, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SharePoint was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SharePoint. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 51 answers that named SharePoint and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
slite.com19
learn.g2.com12
ones.com12
atlassian.com11
g2.com11
bloomfire.com10
thedigitalprojectmanager.com9
document360.com8
monday.com8
larksuite.com7
107 of the 107 domain citations in answers naming SharePoint came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where SharePoint stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where SharePoint stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 673,000 a month (“sharepoint”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 20,386 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 86 of 88 in knowledge base
Segment leader
21%
Notion
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 51 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 40 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as SharePoint
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SharePoint; a claim can dispute any of them.
Google Drive / SharePoint 1Microsoft SharePoint 1Microsoft SharePoint / OneDrive Business 1Sharepoint 1
Follow SharePoint
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Microsoft is the company behind SharePoint.ShowHide
The company
Microsoft is the company behind SharePoint.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- microsoft.com
- Headquarters
- Vancouver, Canada
- Founded
- 1975
- Employees
- about 228,000 (2024)
- Ownership
- Public, 4338 on Hong Kong Stock Exchange
- Also from Microsoft
- Azure Synapse, Bing Webmaster Tools, Microsoft 365, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft Accessibility Insights, Microsoft Ads, Microsoft Advertising, Microsoft Advertising Editor and 49 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Customers named
- ContentsquareServiceNowPangaea DataNeo4jSoftwareOnePresidio
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What SharePoint's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/cs-cz/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SharePoint's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SharePoint, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SharePoint by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SharePoint is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SharePoint, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.