| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge base and self-service | Customer | 5% | 5 of 88 | 15% | 46 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 0% | 42 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LearnUpon at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge base | 6% | 4% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 5 of 88, unchanged |
| Customer education | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 86, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Confluence if you're focused on internal team documentation and already use Jira” Kimi K2 · Knowledge base · direct prompt · first choice
“Often the top pick for mid-sized teams... Confluence leads for B2B collaboration” Grok 4.20 · Knowledge base · direct prompt · first choice
“Notion free + Confluence free 10-user are the most commonly recommended” Muse Glimmer 30B · Knowledge base · budget prompt · first choice
“Confluence for more structure and Jira integration” GPT-6 Luna · Knowledge base · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Search issues: Surfaces archived pages above current ones ... Cost creep: Atlassian pricing changes have frustrated many users” Kimi K2 · Knowledge base · negative prompt · soft negative
“Sluggish performance on large pages, steep learning curve, clunky permissions, dated editor, search degradation at scale.” Grok 4.20 · Knowledge base · negative prompt · soft negative
“not suitable for public help centers and is often better treated as an internal wiki than a customer support KB” Perplexity Sonar · Knowledge base · negative prompt · soft negative
“non-technical teams (like HR or Sales) often find its interface clunky and harder to adopt” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Knowledge base · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 130 of the 142 answers that named Confluence and are not a share of its labels.
391 of the 391 domain citations in answers naming Confluence came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Confluence's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: atlassian.com, atlassian.com/software/jira/pricing, trust.atlassian.com, atlassian.com/platform, atlassian.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Confluence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Confluence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Confluence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: