GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Zendesk Guide · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Zendesk Guide

54Judge labels
2First choices
12Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Knowledge base for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 96 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 19 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In knowledge base · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Zendesk Guide for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Knowledge base and self-serviceCustomer0%20 of 9616%19accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zendesk Guide yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zendesk Guide across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash02114
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast01203
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201113
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels2
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“suited for customer support teams at mid-market and enterprise companies that already use Zendesk” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Knowledge base · direct prompt · alternative
“best if your knowledge base is part of a customer support stack and you already use Zendesk” Perplexity Sonar · Knowledge base · direct prompt · alternative
“Zendesk Guide (part of Zendesk Suite) remains the default market standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Knowledge base · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“For a Customer Support Portal: Go with Zendesk or Document360.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Knowledge base · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid This Tool | Zendesk Guide | You only need a knowledge base (not full support suite)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Knowledge base · negative prompt · hard negative
“However, it is expensive and requires a dedicated administrator to set up correctly.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Knowledge base · direct prompt · soft negative
“Excellent if you already use Zendesk. Don't buy the suite just for the KB.” Kimi K2 · Knowledge base · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zendesk Guide, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zendesk Guide was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Notion43 of 546Not in the top three
Document36041 of 549Not in the top three
Confluence39 of 543Not in the top three
Guru36 of 541Not in the top three
Slite22 of 543Not in the top three
Helpjuice17 of 541Not in the top three
Tettra15 of 540Not in the top three
Bloomfire14 of 541Not in the top three
Help Scout13 of 540Not in the top three
Slab12 of 540Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zendesk Guide. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 54 answers that named Zendesk Guide and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

slite.com5
assembly.com4
learn.g2.com4
ferndesk.com3
helpcenter.io3
productlift.dev3
zendesk.comYour site3
bettermode.com2
egain.com2
exoplatform.com2

Twenty-eight of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Zendesk Guide came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Zendesk Guide

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Zendesk Guide; a claim can dispute any of them.
Zendesk Guide / Zendesk Knowledge 1Zendesk Knowledge 1

The company

Zendesk is the company behind Zendesk Guide.
Website
zendesk.com
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2007
Employees
about 3,830 (2020)
Ownership
Public, zen on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zendesk Guide's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zendesk Guide, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zendesk.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack