Every category where a model named Slite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Knowledge base and self-service	Customer	2%	13 of 96	0%	23	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Slite yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Slite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	3	4
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	0	3
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels3

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative29 labels8not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained13 labels2

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Slite — well-regarded for mid-size/AI-forward teams, self-maintaining freshness, governed review queues; strong for internal use.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Knowledge base · scale prompt · first choice

“Slite: *Best for:* Fast-moving teams wanting a "single source of truth" without bloat.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Knowledge base · scale prompt · alternative

“Slite: $10-20/user/month - AI-forward internal wiki with document verification” Mistral Small · Knowledge base · direct prompt · alternative

“Slite is excellent for teams prioritizing AI-driven content maintenance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Knowledge base · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Slite, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Slite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Notion65 of 6814Not in the top three

Confluence58 of 685Not in the top three

Document36052 of 682Not in the top three

Guru50 of 680Not in the top three

Nuclino32 of 680Not in the top three

Tettra30 of 680Not in the top three

Bloomfire24 of 680Not in the top three

Helpjuice23 of 682Not in the top three

Zendesk Guide22 of 680Not in the top three

Slab20 of 681Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Slite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 68 answers that named Slite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

slite.comYour site7

assembly.com4

egain.com4

ferndesk.com4

guideflow.com4

g2.com3

learn.g2.com3

peoplemanagingpeople.com3

sparrowdesk.com3

bloomfire.com2

Thirty of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Slite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

slite.com/learn/knowledge-base-softwares7

assembly.com/blog/best-knowledge-base-software4

egain.com/best-knowledge-base-software-20264

guideflow.com/blog/best-knowledge-base-software3

learn.g2.com/best-knowledge-base-software3

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-knowledge-base-software3

sparrowdesk.com/tools/best-knowledge-base-software3

bloomfire.com/blog/best-knowledge-base-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Slite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Slite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at slite.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.