GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Nuclino · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Nuclino

47Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Knowledge base for mid-market buyers
Rank 22 of 96 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 17 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In knowledge base · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nuclino for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Knowledge base and self-serviceCustomer0%22 of 966%17accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nuclino yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nuclino across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00404
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200303
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative21 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Nuclino offers a free version with core features such as unlimited workspaces and up to 50 items” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Knowledge base · budget prompt · alternative
“Nuclino at $6/user/month is the best value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Knowledge base · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High-Risk Tools to Avoid ... Outline & Nuclino ... Will fail enterprise procurement security requirements” Mistral Small · Knowledge base · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nuclino, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nuclino was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Notion45 of 4721Not in the top three
Confluence39 of 473Not in the top three
Tettra37 of 470Not in the top three
Slite32 of 477Not in the top three
Document36032 of 471Not in the top three
Guru28 of 470Not in the top three
Helpjuice25 of 470Not in the top three
Slab22 of 472Not in the top three
HelpDocs16 of 470Not in the top three
Bloomfire13 of 470Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nuclino. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 47 answers that named Nuclino and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

slite.com8
ferndesk.com4
desk365.io3
monday.com3
assembly.com2
b2belevation.com2
bolddesk.com2
egain.com2
featurebase.app2
g2.com2

Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Nuclino came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Nuclino

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nuclino; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nuclino/Tettra 1

The company

Nuclino.
Website
nuclino.com
Founded
2016

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nuclino's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nuclino, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nuclino.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.