AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Widen · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Widen

18Judge labels
1First choices
6Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Widen was named 6 times in DAM and 1 other category, where Canto led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Widen for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital asset managementMarketing2%9 of 700%5under 10 labels · led by Canto at 45%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Marketing resource managementMarketing0%60 of 1100%1under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%

Movement

Since September 2026, Widen held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · DAM · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 52 → 56 of 59
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 49 → 9 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 31 of 52

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
DAM0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 49 → 9 of 70
Marketing resource mgt0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 60 of 110, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Widen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“such as Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, or Acquia/Widen” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAM · scale prompt · first choice
“Widen is listed as Mid-market+ enterprises with mature DAM needs.” Muse Glimmer 30B · DAM · direct prompt · alternative
“Solid for asset governance and workflow controls” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Widen, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Widen was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bynder12 of 183Not among the top eight
Aprimo10 of 182Not among the top eight
Brandfolder9 of 180Not among the top eight
Canto8 of 183Not among the top eight
MediaValet8 of 181Not among the top eight
Adobe Experience Manager Assets7 of 180Not among the top eight
Adobe Workfront4 of 181Not among the top eight
Acquia DAM4 of 180Not among the top eight
Teamwork.com3 of 182Not among the top eight
Air3 of 180Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Widen. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 18 answers that named Widen and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com9
aprimo.com8
g2.com7
canto.com6
capterra.com5
soku.ai5
teamwork.com5
zapier.com5
zendikt.com5
air.inc4

No domain is on file for Widen, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Widen

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Widen; a claim can dispute any of them.
Acquia/Widen 1

Follow Widen

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Widen's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Widen, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Widen by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Widen is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Widen, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.