Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 13 of 42
Sinch · 2 categories · Named, not rankedMailjet
17Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mailjet was named 5 times in Email marketing and 1 other category, where HubSpot Marketing Hub led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 49
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market20 of 66
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise4 of 51
9%7 labels
under the label threshold
In email marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Mailjet for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 20 of 66 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email deliverability and testing tools | Marketing | 0% | 89 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Mailjet held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 → 24 of 65
Enterprise▲+9Since September 2026: 0% → 9%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 59 → 4 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 43 → 20 of 66 |
| Email deliverability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 110, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Mailjet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Mailjet across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained14 labels5
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“another budget-friendly choice with free or low-cost plans” Perplexity Sonar · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mailjet, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mailjet was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mailjet, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mailjet was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mailjet. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Mailjet and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mailjet.comYour site11
sender.net10
hostinger.com8
brevo.com7
emailvendorselection.com6
learn.g2.com6
mailtrap.io6
sequenzy.com6
techradar.com6
ventureharbour.com6
Sixty-one of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Mailjet came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mailjet.com
3,884
subdomains included
Content
710
counted in the table below
Documentation
171
Product · Integration
45 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 476 | 2 | 2026-08-03 | CRM, SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 140 | 1 | 2026-09-14 | CRM, Marketing automation | |
| Case study | 26 | 1 | 2026-07-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 19 | 0 | 2020-04-08 | ||
| Template or tool | 18 | 0 | 2025-07-04 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| News or press | 8 | 0 | 2025-11-10 | ||
| Podcast or video | 7 | 0 | 2025-05-07 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Brevo alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-14Bfcm glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-03Sendgrid alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-03Canva blog
- 2026-07-28Palmer hargreaves gmbh case study case study
- 2026-07-15Tracking pixel cnil blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mailjet.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Mailjet
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Sinch is the company behind Mailjet.ShowHide
The company
Sinch is the company behind Mailjet.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- sinch.com
- Headquarters
- Stockholm, Sweden
- Founded
- 2008
- Ownership
- Public, SINCH on Nasdaq Stockholm AB
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The best email marketing software that’s built for devs and loved by marketers.
- For
- For Marketers; For Developers; For Teams
- Price stated
- Free $0/month; Starter $9/month; Essential $19/month; Premium $29/month; Custom mailjet.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 mailjet.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for Free mailjet.com
- Integrations claimed
- 100 mailjet.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2Certified Sender Alliance participantGDPR compliantGDPR-compliant
- Hosting
- EU-based data centers
- Customers named
- MileIQBigTranslationOutdooractiveGaleries LafayetteIONOS Success StoryPalmer Hargreaves GmbHTYPO3book-n-drive
What Mailjet's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mailjet.com, mailjet.com, mailjet.com/pricing, mailjet.com/products, mailjet.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mailjet's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mailjet, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mailjet by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mailjet is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mailjet, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.