Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 140 → 80 of 106
Adobe · 1 category · Named, not rankedAdobe Journey Optimizer
12Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Adobe Journey Optimizer was named 2 times in Ecommerce marketing, where HubSpot Marketing Hub led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market84 of 115
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise32 of 118
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In ecommerce marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Adobe Journey Optimizer for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 84 of 115 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Adobe Journey Optimizer held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Ecommerce marketing · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 74 → 55 of 110
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 140 → 84 of 115 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Adobe Journey Optimizer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Adobe Journey Optimizer across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid the massive price tag and administrative headache of enterprise-level software like Salesforce Marketing Cloud or Adobe/Marketo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce marketing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Journey Optimizer, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Journey Optimizer was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Adobe Journey Optimizer, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adobe Journey Optimizer was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adobe Journey Optimizer. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Adobe Journey Optimizer and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
braze.com8
experienceleague.adobe.comYour site6
salesforce.com5
moengage.com4
sequenzy.com4
bloomreach.com3
business.adobe.comYour site3
insiderone.com3
iterable.com3
klaviyo.com3
Thirty-three of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming Adobe Journey Optimizer came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Adobe Journey Optimizer
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Adobe Journey Optimizer; a claim can dispute any of them.
Adobe 1Adobe/Marketo 1
Follow Adobe Journey Optimizer
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe Journey Optimizer.ShowHide
The company
Adobe is the company behind Adobe Journey Optimizer.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- adobe.com
- Headquarters
- San Jose, United States
- Founded
- 1982
- Employees
- about 25,988 (2021)
- Ownership
- Public, ABS on London Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Journey Optimizer exposes REST endpoints that let you programmatically perform key operations in your applications.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Adobe Journey Optimizer's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: developer.adobe.com/journey-optimizer-apis, developer.adobe.com/journey-optimizer-b2b-apis, developer.adobe.com/journey-optimizer-b2b-apis/postman, developer.adobe.com/journey-optimizer-b2b-apis/examples, developer.adobe.com/journey-optimizer-b2b-apis/data-flow. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adobe Journey Optimizer's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adobe Journey Optimizer, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Adobe Journey Optimizer by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Adobe Journey Optimizer is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Adobe Journey Optimizer, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.