AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Marketing › Proximity › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Retail, proximity and IoT marketing for enterprise buyers

Asked as “proximity marketing platform”, and as “location-based and in-store marketing tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
18%
Contested · Braze 8%
18Radar08Braze08Propensity67others

18% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▼−4Since September 2026: 24% → 20%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Radar held the lead, −4 points on 24%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Radar18%12%26accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 24% → 20%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.24% → 20%
02Gimbal6%8%24accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 10% → 4%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 4%
03Foursquare Proximity6%8%25accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 20% → 7%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 7%
04Kontakt.io4%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 4%
05GroundTruth2%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
06Estimote0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Radar18%
02Gimbal6%
03Foursquare Proximity6%
04Kontakt.io4%
05GroundTruth2%
06Estimote0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Braze
33%
3 of 9 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Other strong contenders include **Braze, CleverTap, and Airship**, but they tend to have more complex pricing ... harder to forecast at scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt
CleverTap
43%
3 of 7 labels negative · 3 of 14 models
“Medium (MAU tiers, starts low but custom for enterprise) | Good | Less enterprise testimonials” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
Mobilewalla
100%
2 of 2 labels negative · 2 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“The FTC banned Mobilewalla from selling sensitive location data after the company was found to have collected and sold precise location data without verified consumer consent.” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Kochava
100%
2 of 2 labels negative · 2 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Kochava settled a long-running FTC lawsuit, resulting in a ban on selling or sharing sensitive consumer location data without explicit consent.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1197 links across 392 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 21 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

47 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
45 answers · 78 citations · 11 models
43 answers · 87 citations · 13 models
41 answers · 55 citations · 11 models
37 answers · 59 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SourceForge31 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 42 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Gartner20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · LinkedIn13 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Foursquare11 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Radar11 answers · 15 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best proximity marketing platform”, “proximity marketing platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Radar radar.com18%101673,00059,52611,37129
Propensity propensity.com8%2440,5001,0154,134$1,09324
Braze braze.com8%50527,1006,39555,552$13,11259
Gimbal infillion.com6%5140,5007,9792,257
Foursquare Proximity foursquare.com6%7301,147,419
LighthousePE lighthousepe.ai6%5
Kontakt.io kontakt.io4%43720179,70616
Dotti4%
GroundTruth groundtruth.com2%395,400569,9096
Bluedot bluedot.io2%2022,2002024,409

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, thecmo.com). The first result for “best proximity marketing platform” is thecmo.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best proximity marketing platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which location-based and in-store marketing tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade proximity marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best proximity marketing platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a proximity marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which proximity marketing platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceGimbalChanged
Two alternativesMetaLocator, Staffbase
Netmera, SAP Engagement Cloud
Two alternativesJuniper Mist User Engagement, Zebra Technologies
Bluepixel Technologies
Two alternativesPurple WiFi, Spindle Yowza! Beacon Platform
no first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 miniInsider
Two alternativesNetmera, SAP Engagement Cloud
SalsifyChangedFoursquare Proximity
Three alternativesFootmarks SmartConnect, Infillion Gimbal, Radar
Rezolveno first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashPropensity, Xtremepush
Three alternativesBraze, El Toro, Reveal Mobile
Ansira, AppspaceChanged
Four alternativesMappedin, Pointr, Raydiant, SOCi
Radar
Five alternativesBluedot, Infillion Gimbal, Kontakt.io, Uniqode, Xtremepush
Fencemaker, Radar
Two alternativesAmazon Location Service, PlotProjects
no first choiceagainst: Eddystone, Google Nearby Notifications, Gravy Analytics, InMarket Media, Kochava, Mobilewalla, Outlogic
Perplexity SonarFoursquare Proximity, SAP Engagement Cloud
Two alternativesCrowd Connected, Demandbase
against: Uberall
RadarChanged
Five alternativesFoursquare Proximity, GroundTruth, SOCi, Uberall, Yext
no first choiceFoursquare Proximityagainst: Kontakt.io, PlotProjectsno first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastRadar
Two alternativesBluedot, Foursquare Proximity
against: Birdeye, DWELL, SOCi
UniqodeChanged
One alternativeGroundTruth
against: Cisco Hyperlocation, PlotProjects, Radar
Bluedot
Five alternativesEstimote, Foursquare Proximity, Gimbal, Kontakt.io, Navigine
Braze
One alternativeAirship
against: CleverTap, Radar
Airship, Braze, Radaragainst: Aisle411, Braze, Estimote, Kontakt.io, PromoInCloud, UBMe
Mistral SmallDWELL™, Woosmap
One alternativeZeta Global
Crowd ConnectedChanged
Two alternativesAdobe Commerce, Openbravo’s Commerce Cloud
Radar
Five alternativesAirship, Aislelabs, Foursquare Proximity, Gimbal, Kontakt.io
LighthousePE
Two alternativesGimbal, Radar
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashRadar
Two alternativesFoursquare Proximity, Gimbal
RadarHeld
Three alternativesBluedot, Lastmile Retail, Raydiant
Foursquare Proximity, Gimbal
Three alternativesEstimote, Kontakt.io, Radar
against: Airship
Radaragainst: Airship, Braze, CleverTap, Foursquare Proximity, LighthousePE, Mapstedno first choicenothing named
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashKontakt.io
Three alternativesBlueCats, Radius Networks, Swirl Network
Kontakt.ioHeld
Three alternativesPlaced, Salesforce, The Trade Desk
Airship, OneSignal
Three alternativesEstimote, PlaceIQ, Unanimous AI
LighthousePE
Four alternativesBluedot, Kontakt.io, Radar, Xtremepush
no first choiceagainst: Fosbury & Roximity, Gimbal, Google\u2019s Beacon Platform, Swirl Networks, UBL Me
Kimi K2Braze
Three alternativesFoursquare Proximity, Gimbal, Radar
Bluedot, Dotti, Salesforce Marketing CloudChanged
Three alternativesBluecore, Foursquare Proximity, Gimbal
Gimbal
Four alternativesFoursquare Proximity, InMarket, PlotProjects, Radar
Aislelabs
One alternativeMapsted
against: Radar
no first choice
Five alternativesCloud4Wi, Estimote, Foursquare Proximity, PlotProjects, Purple
against: Android Nearby Notifications, Google's Deprecated Beacon Platform
GLM 4.7 FlashXFoursquare Proximity
Five alternativesAisle411, Gimbal, Navigine, PlotProjects, Zapt / indoo.rs
Juniper Mist User EngagementChangedGimbal, GroundTruth, Simpli.fiGimbal, Radaragainst: Airship, Braze, CleverTapno first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5Demandbase, Propensity
Three alternativesFoundry ABM, Gimbal, N.Rich
against: InMarket
PropensityChanged
Four alternativesAdQuick, GEOimpact Pro, Poppulo, Staffbase
Radar
Six alternativesEstimote, Foursquare Proximity, Gimbal, GroundTruth, Kontakt.io, Simpli.fi
Braze, Radaragainst: LighthousePEno first choiceagainst: July Systems – Proximity MX, Mobilewalla, X‑Mode Social / Outlogic
GPT-6 LunaPropensity
Four alternativesAdQuick, Footmarks, Foursquare Proximity, InZynk
DottiChanged
Three alternativesRadar, SOCi, Uberall
Radar
Five alternativesBraze, Flybuy, GroundTruth, Infillion Gimbal, Pointr
Thinaire
One alternativePulsi
no first choiceagainst: Estimote, Gimbal, Kochava, Radius Networks
Muse Glimmer 30BGimbal
Two alternativesEstimote, Kontakt.io
GroundTruthChanged
One alternativeGimbal
Gimbal
Seven alternativesCleverTap, GroundTruth, Kontakt.io, Radar, Simpli.fi, Swirl Networks, Xtremepush
LighthousePE
One alternativeGimbal
no first choiceagainst: Foursquare Proximity
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:55yes197 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:25yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:58yes2828 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:29yes164 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:56yes1910 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:46yes116 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:04yes2144 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:11yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 14:11yes1763 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:37yes1117 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:29yes2125 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:50yes1839 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:29yes416 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:05yes2020 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:22yes187 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:43yes24 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:29yes1623 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:58yes172 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:20yes236 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:36yes144 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:13yes2325 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:00yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:04no031 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:35yes2424 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:05yes2463 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:57yes2292 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:58yes321 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 07:44yes1926 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:34yes149 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:46yes58 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 14:01yes2329 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:05yes174 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:45yes199 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:25yes87 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:50yes2339 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:45yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:04no036 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:17yes2425 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:29yes2435 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:37yes2034 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:19yes624 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:05yes2240 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:59yes188 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:32yes46 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:03yes1833 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:36yes165 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:38yes1610 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:01yes178 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:56yes2127 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:21yes51 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:28yes22115 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:59yes2024 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:42yes2172 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:08yes1950 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:34yes214 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:39yes1730 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:09yes1910 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:47yes06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 14:00no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:49yes207 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:03yes1916 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:43no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:14yes2536 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:33yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:06no027 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:54yes2432 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:42yes2472 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:04no010 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:15yes316 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:03yes1522 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:23yes209 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:37yes34 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:56yes2223 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 14:12yes134 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:37yes1410 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:00yes53 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:47yes2043 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:51yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:06yes24106 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:19yes2323 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:59no037 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:13yes2154 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:07yes234 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 14:05yes2328 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Foursquare read as Foursquare Proximity
Foursquare (Enterprise Solutions) read as Foursquare Proximity
Foursquare (Pilgrim SDK) read as Foursquare Proximity
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon Location Service (AWS)
Appspace
Aruba
Aruba Networks
Bluecore
Bluepixel Technologies
Cisco
Cisco Hyperlocation
DWELL™
Eddystone (Physical Web)
Fencemaker
Footmarks
Footmarks SmartConnect
Fosbury & Roximity
Foursquare Place-Based Marketing
GEOimpact Pro
GS1
Google's Deprecated Beacon Platform (Eddystone/Proximity API)
Google\u2019s Beacon Platform (Eddystone)
Here Technologies
July Systems – Proximity MX
Juniper Mist
Lastmile Retail
Microsoft
Morebeacon
Openbravo’s Commerce Cloud
PlaceIQ
Pulsi
Qualcomm
Rezolve (formerly Bluedot)
Salesforce
Sensorberg
Spindle Yowza! Beacon Platform
Swirl Network
TomTom
UBL Me
Unanimous AI
X‑Mode Social / Outlogic
Zapt / indoo.rs
Zebra Technologies
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Retail mediaReviews →