Review and reputation management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “online review management platform”, and as “reputation management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
26%
Contested · Reputation 24%
26Birdeye24Reputation11G2 Buyer Intent39others
26% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−3Since September 2026: 31% → 28%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Birdeye held the lead, −3 points on 31%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
NiceJob15%Contested▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Birdeye18%Contested▼−6Since September 2026: 26% → 20%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseBirdeye26%Contested▼−3Since September 2026: 31% → 28%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
NiceJob15%Contested▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketBirdeye18%Contested▼−6Since September 2026: 26% → 20%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseBirdeye26%Contested▼−3Since September 2026: 31% → 28%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Birdeye26%15%61accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 31% → 28%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 28%
Birdeye26%15%61accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 31% → 28%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.31% → 28%02
Reputation24%16%61accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 18% → 25%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 25%
Reputation24%16%61accepted challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 18% → 25%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.18% → 25%03
ReviewTrackers2%19%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
ReviewTrackers2%19%26accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%04
Bazaarvoice2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Bazaarvoice2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%05
Trustpilot2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Trustpilot2%12%16accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%06
Sprinklr2%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Sprinklr2%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Podium0%50%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Podium0%50%20criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Yext0%18%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Yext0%18%28accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
SOCi0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
SOCi0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All fifteen head-to-head pages: the top six products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Birdeye26%
Birdeye26%02Reputation24%
Reputation24%03ReviewTrackers2%
ReviewTrackers2%04Bazaarvoice2%
Bazaarvoice2%05Trustpilot2%
Trustpilot2%06Sprinklr2%
Sprinklr2%07Yext0%
Yext0%08SOCi0%
SOCi0%09Podium0%
Podium0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Birdeye15%
9 of 61 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictable Pricing: | **Birdeye** | Per-location ($299+/location) | Costs scale aggressively” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Reputation16%
10 of 61 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Reputation.com (history of breaches)” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Podium50%
10 of 20 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“SMB-First and "Messaging-First" Platforms * **Examples:** *Podium, Swell, NiceJob* * **The Risk:** **Scalability Bottlenecks, Prohibitive Pricing, and Weak Governance**” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Yext18%
5 of 28 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Yext**: ~$199+/location/year; scales linearly.” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1151 links across 324 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Birdeye56 answers · 134 citations · 13 models
44 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
38 answers · 87 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Zapier27 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
22 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · AppFollow20 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SurveySparrow17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Hootsuite14 answers · 14 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FeedbackRobot14 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Viasocket13 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
45 answers · 12 models
44 answers · 12 models
27 answers · 12 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best online review management platform”, “online review management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birdeye birdeye.com | 26% | 302 | 22,200 | 380 | 6,787,611 | $1,735 | 110 | 2 |
| Reputation reputation.com | 24% | 111 | 40,500 | 271,545 | 42,552 | $8,985 | 11 | 8 |
| G2 Buyer Intent g2.com | 11% | 163 | 90 | 1 | 2,221,182 | 109 | 9 | |
| Reviewflowz reviewflowz.com | 7% | 30 | 170 | 0 | 2,034 | $467 | 11 | |
| Meltwater meltwater.com | 4% | 317 | 14,800 | 405 | 52,658 | $6 | 36 | |
| Sprinklr sprinklr.com Sprinklr 2%, Sprinklr Social 2% | 4% | 99 | 14,800 | 464 | 331,213 | 4 | ||
| ReviewInc reviewinc.com ReviewInc 2%, ReviewInc Enterprise Reputation Management 2% | 4% | 2 | ||||||
| ReviewTrackers reviewtrackers.com | 2% | 60 | 1,300 | 6 | 26,906 | 0 | 5 | |
| Bazaarvoice bazaarvoice.com | 2% | 17 | 8,100 | 192 | 26,232 | $2,038 | 60 | |
| Trustpilot trustpilot.com | 2% | 50 | 165,000 | 2,892 | 88,097,858 | 35 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (appfollow.io, birdeye.com, learn.g2.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best online review management platform” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best online review management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which reputation management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade review and reputation management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best online review management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an online review management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which review and reputation management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Birdeye, ReviewflowzReputation, SprinklrChangedBirdeyeGrade.usno first choiceagainst: Reputation, five.reviews
One alternative
YextTwo alternatives
DSMN8, SociabbleThree alternatives
Caliber, Reputation, Sprout SocialTwo alternatives
Chatmeter, ReputationGPT-5.4 miniG2 Buyer IntentSprinklr SocialChangedReputationTrustpilotno first choiceagainst: Sitejabber
Two alternatives
Birdeye, ReviewTrackersThree alternatives
Birdeye, Mobrium, ReputationFive alternatives
Birdeye, Experience.com, SOCi, Sprinklr, YextOne alternative
BirdeyeGemini 3.5 FlashReviewflowzReputationChangedReputation, YextBirdeyeReputationagainst: NiceJob, Podium, Swell, Yext
Three alternatives
CustomerGauge, G2 Buyer Intent, ReputationFive alternatives
EveryoneSocial, G2 Marketing Solutions, Glassdoor Enterprise, Meltwater, Sprout SocialFive alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Qualtrics, SOCi, SprinklrFour alternatives
EmbedMyReviews, GatherUp, Reputation, SOCiFive alternatives
Birdeye, G2 Buyer Intent, TrustRadius, Trustpilot, YextPerplexity SonarBirdeyeReputationChangedBirdeyeInMomentagainst: Reputation, Sprinklr Socialno first choiceagainst: Grade.us, NiceJob, OpenTable, Podium, Reputation, TripAdvisor-centric tools, Yelp for Business
Two alternatives
G2 Marketing Solutions, Sprinklr SocialTwo alternatives
G2 Marketing Solutions, YextFive alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Chatmeter, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, SprinklrOne alternative
BirdeyeGrok 4.1 FastBazaarvoiceBirdeyeChangedagainst: Cision, Hootsuite, PodiumBirdeyeBirdeyeagainst: Hootsuite, Podium, ReviewSense.ai Enterprise, Yext, Yotpono first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Hootsuite, Podium, Reputation, ReviewGrower, ReviewTrackers, Trustpilot, Yelp for Business, Yotpo
Three alternatives
Birdeye, Reputation, SprinklrOne alternative
ReputationSix alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Podium, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, Trustpilot, YotpoThree alternatives
Reputation, ReviewTrackers, SOCiThree alternatives
Birdeye, Reputation, ReviewTrackersMistral SmallBirdeyeMeltwaterChangedReputationReviewIncagainst: Birdeye, ReviewTrackersno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Clutch, Experience.comOne alternative
ReputationSix alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Brandwatch, Meltwater, ReviewInc, SOCiOne alternative
ReputationDeepSeek V4 FlashBirdeye, G2 Buyer IntentReputationChangedBirdeyeagainst: Sprout SocialReviewGroweragainst: Birdeyeno first choiceagainst: Podium, Reputation, ReviewGrower, Sprinklr, TheBestReputation / Managed Service Providers, Yext
Five alternatives
Capterra, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, TrustRadius, TrustpilotThree alternatives
Birdeye, Meltwater, TalkwalkerFive alternatives
Podium, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, SOCi, YextOne alternative
ReputationFour alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Trustpilot, YotpoLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldBirdeye, Reputationno first choiceno first choicenothing named
One alternative
YextQwen 3.7 FlashBirdeyeReputationChangedBirdeye, Reputation, YextReviewTrackersagainst: Hootsuite, Sprout Socialno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Cinquo, Grade.us, Reputation, Reputation Pros, ReviewTrackers, RightResponse AI, Text Request, TheBestReputation
Two alternatives
Reputation, ReviewTrackersTwo alternatives
Meltwater, YextOne alternative
PodiumTwo alternatives
Reputation, SOCiKimi K2G2 Buyer Intent, TrustRadiusReputationChangedBirdeyeagainst: Reputation, ReviewTrackersChatmeteragainst: Birdeye, Podiumno first choiceagainst: ReviewGrower
Three alternatives
Birdeye, Reputation, ReviewflowzTwo alternatives
Birdeye, SprinklrFour alternatives
Chatmeter, Sprinklr, Trustpilot, YextTwo alternatives
Reputation, SOCiFive alternatives
Birdeye, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, Sprout Social, YextGLM 4.7 FlashXG2 Buyer IntentBirdeyeChangedBirdeyeReviewflowzno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Reputation, Yext
Six alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Feefo, Reputation, TrustRadius, TrustpilotOne alternative
Brand24Eight alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Brandwatch, Podium, Reputation, Sprout Social, Talkwalker, Yext, YotpoOne alternative
ReputationMiniMax M2.5ReputationReputationHeldBirdeye, ReputationBirdeyeagainst: Sprout SocialBirdeye, Reputationagainst: Amazon, Birdeye, BrightLocal, Google Business Profile, Moz, Podium, Reputation, Reputation Defender, ReviewPush, ReviewTrackers, Scorecard Research, Sitejabber, TripAdvisor, TrustYou, Trustpilot, Yelp for Business, Yext
Four alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, G2 Buyer Intent, TrustpilotTwo alternatives
Birgeye, MeltwaterFive alternatives
Brandwatch, Podium, ReviewTrackers, Sprinklr, YextTwo alternatives
Reputation, SOCiGPT-6 LunaG2 Buyer IntentMeltwaterChangedno first choiceBirdeyeno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Podium, ReviewVio
Three alternatives
Birdeye, Gartner Peer Insights, YextTwo alternatives
Brandwatch, EveryoneSocialNine alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, Chatmeter, Podium, Reputation, SOCi, Sprinklr, Trustpilot, YextOne alternative
SOCiMuse Glimmer 30BReputationReputation, formerly Reputation.comChangedBirdeyeReviewInc Enterprise Reputation Managementno first choiceagainst: Birdeye, Podium, Reputation, Sprinklr
Three alternatives
Bazaarvoice, Birdeye, TrustpilotThree alternatives
Birdeye, Brandwatch, MeltwaterFour alternatives
Chatmeter, Reputation, ReviewTrackers, YextTwo alternatives
GetReviews.ai Enterprise, ReviewTrackersBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:49 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 17 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:58 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 19 | 66 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 16 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 14:05 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:04 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 16 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 14:07 | yes | 22 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 14:16 | yes | 8 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:40 | yes | 6 | 49 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:12 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 8 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 27 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 18 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:52 | yes | 23 | 57 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 24 | 41 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 21 | 213 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:18 | yes | 9 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 22 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:57 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:04 | yes | 21 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 14 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 14:14 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 23 | 150 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 19 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 18 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:06 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:38 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:49 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 21 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:34 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:01 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 14:00 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 2 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 27 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:55 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:23 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 24 | 46 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 14:16 | yes | 23 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:29 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 4 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Yelp read as Yelp for Business
Unresolved, counted raw
Birgeye
Caliber
Clear My Name
Culture Amp
Feefo
GetReviews.ai Enterprise
Glassdoor Enterprise
Kudos
Mobrium
OpenTable
Reputation Defender
Reputation Pros
Reputation, formerly Reputation.com
ReviewGate / Trustpilot
ReviewInc Enterprise Reputation Management
ReviewVio
Scorecard Research
Shine Studio
Text Request
TheBestReputation
TheBestReputation / Managed Service Providers
TripAdvisor-centric tools
TrustYou
five.reviews
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.