AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Marketing › SEO › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

SEO and content optimization platforms for enterprise buyers

Asked as “SEO and content optimization platform”, and as “SEO content optimization tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · seoClarity 13%
40Conductor13seoClarity11BrightEdge36others

40% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▼−3Since September 2026: 41% → 39%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Conductor held the lead, −3 points on 41%, inside the 11-point floor.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Conductor40%12%65endorsed leader▼−3Since September 2026: 41% → 39%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.41% → 39%
02seoClarity13%10%41accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 11%
03BrightEdge11%24%58accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 7% → 14%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 14%
04Clearscope11%18%38accepted challenger▲+9Since September 2026: 2% → 11%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 11%
05Semrush9%15%47accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 12% → 11%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 11%
06Surfer SEO6%35%26criticized challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%
07MarketMuse4%23%26accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 0%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Moz0%57%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
08Ahrefs0%21%34accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Siteimprove0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Botify0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Conductor40%
02seoClarity13%
03BrightEdge11%
04Clearscope11%
05Semrush9%
06Surfer SEO6%
07MarketMuse4%
08Ahrefs0%
09Botify0%
10Siteimprove0%
11Moz0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BrightEdge
24%
14 of 58 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“buyers commonly leave it over cost and lock-in... "Most teams leave BrightEdge due to underutilization, not missing features."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Conductor
12%
8 of 65 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“most traditional enterprise SEO platforms (like Conductor, BrightEdge, or Ahrefs Enterprise) are poor choices” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Surfer SEO
35%
9 of 26 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“"Surfer is not a full SEO suite"... "Locked Into Expensive Subscriptions"... "Some users reported decreased rankings after implementing Surfer's suggestions."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Moz
57%
8 of 14 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“**Why Avoid**: Better for small-mid teams; enterprises report "trash" reliability and UI friction at scale.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1176 links across 308 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 4 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Conductor60 answers · 98 citations · 14 models
32 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
vendor site · AirOps27 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Search Atlas21 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ahrefs20 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Siteimprove20 answers · 25 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
vendor site · HubSpot18 answers · 31 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Gartner18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · seoClarity16 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best seo and content optimization platform”, “seo and content optimization platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Conductor conductor.com
Conductor 40%, Searchmetrics 0%
40%11749,50026,95645,843308
seoClarity seoclarity.net13%49720912,039$1947
BrightEdge brightedge.com11%714,40018027,2182
Clearscope clearscope.io11%120880165,7370
Semrush semrush.com9%37890,5002,0552,885,637$1,727103
Surfer SEO surferseo.com6%1475,40014699,288221
MarketMuse marketmuse.com4%758801698,619
AirOps airops.com2%296,600312,668$1,55020
Sight AI trysight.ai2%20
Dragon Metrics2%

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blog.hubspot.com, conductor.com, seoclarity.net, siteimprove.com). The first result for “best seo and content optimization platform” is reddit.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best SEO and content optimization platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which SEO content optimization tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SEO and content optimization platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SEO and content optimization platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an SEO and content optimization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SEO and content optimization platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Semrush
Five alternativesBotify, BrightEdge, StoryChief, Surfer SEO, seoClarity
BrightEdgeChanged
Three alternativesClearscope, DeepCrawl, Semrush
BrightEdge, Conductor
Six alternativesAhrefs, Botify, Lumar, Semrush, Siteimprove, Surfer SEO
seoClarity
One alternativeAdvanced Web Ranking
against: BrightEdge, Conductor
no first choiceagainst: Ahrefs, Botify, BrightEdge, Moz, Semrush, Writesonic, seoClarity
GPT-5.4 miniConductor
One alternativeSemrush
ConductorHeld
Two alternativesClearscope, MarketMuse
Semrush
Four alternativesAhrefs, Botify, BrightEdge, Conductor
Clearscope
Two alternativesJetOctopus, Siteimprove
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashConductor
Four alternativesBrightEdge, MarketMuse, Semrush, seoClarity
ConductorHeld
Four alternativesBrightEdge, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush for Enterprise
no first choiceseoClarity
Two alternativesClearscope, Conductor
against: BrightEdge
Conductor
Five alternativesBotify, BrightEdge, Lumar, Semrush, seoClarity
against: Ahrefs
against: All in One SEO, Mangools, Rank Math, Ranktracker, Serpstat, SpyFu, Ubersuggest, Yoast SEO
Perplexity SonarConductor
Four alternativesBotify, BrightEdge, Semrush, seoClarity
ConductorHeld
Two alternativesClearscope, MarketMuse
no first choice
Seven alternativesAhrefs, Botify, BrightEdge, Conductor, Semrush, Siteimprove, seoClarity
AirOps
One alternativeSemrush
against: MarketMuse
no first choiceagainst: Ahrefs, RankIQ, Screaming Frog, Semrush
Grok 4.1 FastConductor
Two alternativesBrightEdge, seoClarity
against: Clearscope, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO
ConductorHeld
Three alternativesBrightEdge, Semrush, seoClarity
BrightEdge, Conductor
Six alternativesAhrefs, Botify, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush, Surfer SEO
against: Moz, Siteimprove, Yext
Conductor, Semrush
Three alternativesBotify, BrightEdge, seoClarity
against: Clearscope, MarketMuse, SE Ranking, Surfer SEO
no first choiceagainst: Ahrefs Site Explorer, BrightEdge, Clearscope, Frase, MarketMuse, Moz, Screaming Frog standalone, Semalt, Semrush, Surfer SEO
Mistral SmallClearscope, Surfer SEO
Three alternativesBrightEdge, Conductor, Semrush
Clearscope, Surfer SEOHeld
Two alternativesAirOps, Conductor
Conductor
Four alternativesBrightEdge, Searchmetrics, Siteimprove, seoClarity
Sight AI
Two alternativesAhrefs, Semrush
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashConductor
Four alternativesClearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush, Surfer SEO
against: BrightEdge
BrightEdge, ConductorChanged
Three alternativesMarketMuse, Semrush, seoClarity
BrightEdge, Conductor
Seven alternativesAhrefs, Botify, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush, Surfer SEO, seoClarity
Conductoragainst: BrightEdge, Semrush for Enterprise, seoClarityBrightEdge
Three alternativesBotify, Clearscope, Semrush
against: Conductor
against: BrightEdge, Clearscope, Conductor, Frase, MarketMuse, Moz, Standard Google Analytics, Surfer SEO, Yext
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceClearscope, Surfer SEOChangedno first choiceConductor
Two alternativesAirOps, seoClarity
no first choiceagainst: Screaming Frog, Semrush
Qwen 3.7 FlashConductor
Three alternativesAhrefs, BrightEdge, Semrush
against: Botify
SemrushChanged
Three alternativesClearscope, ContentKing, Surfer SEO
no first choice
Three alternativesAhrefs, Conductor, seoClarity
Dragon Metrics
One alternativeAdvanced Web Ranking
against: Ahrefs, BrightEdge, Conductor, Semrush
no first choiceagainst: Ahrefs, Moz, Semrush
Kimi K2Conductor
Two alternativesBrightEdge, MarketMuse
against: Clearscope
ClearscopeChanged
Two alternativesBrightEdge, Conductor
BrightEdge, Conductor
Four alternativesAhrefs, Botify, Searchmetrics, Semrush
against: Lumar
seoClarity
Three alternativesClearscope, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO
against: BrightEdge, Conductor
no first choiceagainst: BrightEdge, Clearscope, Moz, Surfer SEO, seoClarity
GLM 4.7 FlashXBrightEdge, seoClarity
Six alternativesAhrefs, AthenaHQ, Clearscope, Conductor, MarketMuse, Semrush
BrightEdgeChanged
One alternativeseoClarity
Conductor
Seven alternativesAhrefs, Botify, BrightEdge, Clearscope, Semrush, Surfer SEO, seoClarity
Semrush
Two alternativesConductor, seoClarity
against: Moz
no first choiceagainst: Ahrefs, Botify, BrightEdge, Conductor, HubSpot Content Hub, MarketMuse, Moz, Screaming Frog, Siteimprove, Surfer SEO, seoClarity
MiniMax M2.5Conductor
Four alternativesBrightEdge, Clearscope, Semrush, Surfer SEO
BrightEdge, SemrushChanged
Two alternativesAhrefs, Conductor
Ahrefs, Semrush
Four alternativesBrightEdge, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO
seoClarity
One alternativeConductor
against: BrightEdge
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Marketo Engage SEO, BrightEdge, Clearscope, Frase, Long Tail Pro, Lorelight, Surfer SEO
GPT-6 LunaConductor
Three alternativesBrightEdge, Semrush, seoClarity
ConductorHeld
One alternativeClearscope
Conductor, Semrush for Enterprise
Five alternativesAhrefs, BrightEdge, Clearscope, MarketMuse, seoClarity
seoClarityagainst: ConductorConductor, seoClarity
One alternativeBrightEdge
against: Ahrefs, Semrush, Surfer SEO
Muse Glimmer 30BClearscope, MarketMuse
Three alternativesBrightEdge, Conductor, seoClarity
MarketMuseChanged
Two alternativesClearscope, Surfer SEO
Conductor
Five alternativesBrightEdge, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO, seoClarity
Conductor
One alternativeSEOcrawl AI
no first choiceagainst: BrightEdge, Conductor, Searchmetrics, Surfer SEO
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:54yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:55yes24 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:45yes1227 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:22yes203 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:32yes2515 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:07yes157 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:04yes2324 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:40yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:10yes930 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:34yes1525 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:04yes2365 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:45yes1414 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 09:41yes415 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:15yes2231 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:54yes98 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:02yes56 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:13yes1628 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:23yes204 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:02yes227 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:32yes510 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:26yes2327 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:47yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:55no029 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:46yes1523 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 14:17yes2276 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:46yes821 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:53yes214 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 13:32yes2228 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:50yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:03yes48 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:49yes1524 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:20yes177 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:25yes2010 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:37yes109 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:11yes2453 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 14:05yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:08yes943 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:29yes1927 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:05yes2243 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:38yes1529 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:54yes722 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:52yes2247 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:14yes188 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:08yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:19yes2026 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:04yes205 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:31yes2312 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:39yes137 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:33yes2131 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:26yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:59yes1065 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:08yes2428 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:00yes2129 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:29yes2129 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:33yes315 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 07:50yes2139 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:11yes1714 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:11no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:47yes1730 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:10yes204 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:13yes1413 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:23no010 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:51yes2356 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:33yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:52no033 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:27yes2233 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:56no037 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:00yes519 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:15yes120 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:56yes1223 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:38yes2312 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:08yes06 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:12yes1124 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:50yes204 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:33yes2410 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:03yes179 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:49yes2444 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:11yes51 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:27yes2394 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:51yes2524 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:21yes24155 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:43yes2240 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 14:13yes423 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:19yes2531 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
None. Every name in this category resolved on its own.
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Marketo Engage SEO
Ahrefs Site Explorer
All in One SEO
ContentKing
Dragon Metrics
Harbor
Jasper for Business
JetOctopus
LayerSEO
Lorelight (GEO)
Rank Ranger
SEOcrawl AI
Screaming Frog standalone
Semalt
Semrush Content Template
Standard Google Analytics
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Paid adsSMS & WhatsApp →