AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM data and infrastructure › Session replay › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Session replay and heatmaps for enterprise buyers

Asked as “session replay and heatmap tool”, and as “website visitor behavior analytics tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · Contentsquare 19%
28Fullstory19Contentsquare11Glassbox42others

28% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01Fullstory28%20%66accepted challenger
02Contentsquare19%12%51accepted challenger
03Glassbox11%0%42accepted challenger
04Microsoft Clarity9%53%38criticized challenger
05Quantum Metric8%8%38accepted challenger
06LogRocket2%23%39accepted challenger
07OpenReplay2%6%16accepted challenger
08PostHog2%11%18accepted challenger
09Hotjar2%48%44criticized challenger
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Mouseflow0%62%16criticized challenger
11Smartlook0%36%14criticized challenger
10Amplitude0%7%15accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Fullstory28%
02Contentsquare19%
03Glassbox11%
04Microsoft Clarity9%
05Quantum Metric8%
06LogRocket2%
07OpenReplay2%
08PostHog2%
09Hotjar2%
10Amplitude0%
11Smartlook0%
12Mouseflow0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Clarity
53%
20 of 38 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid, or be highly cautious about... Microsoft Clarity ... free is a major liability” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Hotjar
48%
21 of 44 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“**Hotjar** has specifically been flagged in research for: - Recording content beyond input fields - Default settings that start recording before consent - Historical data breach concerns” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Fullstory
20%
13 of 66 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“you should avoid the common "per-session" or "per-MAU" pricing models used by FullStory, LogRocket, Hotjar, and Datadog” Kimi K2, budget prompt
LogRocket
23%
9 of 39 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Free/self-serve tiers of any session replay tool (including Hotjar free, LogRocket free, Smartlook free, etc.) Verdict: Avoid for any production enterprise property” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1121 links across 260 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Quantum Metric51 answers · 95 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Pendo32 answers · 41 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Contentsquare31 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Amplitude26 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Fullstory22 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Plerdy18 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Userpilot18 answers · 19 citations · 7 models
vendor site · UXCam18 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Mouseflow17 answers · 18 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best session replay and heatmap tool”, “session replay and heatmap tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Fullstory fullstory.com28%2265,400159141,869$34814
Contentsquare contentsquare.com
Contentsquare 19%, Hotjar 2%
21%3099,900226149,92586
Glassbox glassbox.com11%756,6001619,0820
Microsoft clarity.microsoft.com
Microsoft Clarity 9%
9%2152,240,000403,13644,297
Quantum Metric quantummetric.com8%771,900716,885486
Pendo pendo.io4%42012,10076119,185$3,60993
ZoomInfo zoominfo.com4%846135,0001,8106,376,738$1,140120
LogRocket logrocket.com2%1173,60083252,22211
OpenReplay openreplay.com2%305905185,076
PostHog posthog.com2%35533,10027125,936120

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (learn.g2.com, quantummetric.com). The first result for “best session replay and heatmap tool” is learn.g2.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best session replay and heatmap tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which website visitor behavior analytics tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade session replay and heatmap tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best session replay and heatmap tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a session replay and heatmap tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which session replay and heatmap tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Fullstory, Quantum Metric
Two alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox
HotjarChanged
Three alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel, Pendo
against: Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 4
no first choiceGlassbox
Two alternativesContentsquare, Mouseflow
against: Fullstory, Quantum Metric
no first choiceagainst: Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Quantum Metric
GPT-5.4 miniContentsquare
Three alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket
ContentsquareHeld
One alternativeMicrosoft Clarity
Contentsquare
Three alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, Hotjar
against: Mouseflow
Inspectlet
Two alternativesFullstory, Glassbox
against: Amplitude, Hotjar
no first choiceagainst: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Gemini 3.5 FlashFullstory
Three alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket
ContentsquareChanged
Five alternatives6sense, Amplitude, Fullstory, Glassbox, ZoomInfo
Contentsquare
Four alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
Microsoft Clarity
Three alternativesGlassbox, LogRocket, OpenReplay
Fullstory
Four alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Crazy Egg, Hotjar, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, OpenReplay, PostHog, Yandex Metrica
Perplexity SonarContentsquare
Two alternativesFullstory, Quantum Metric
against: Microsoft Clarity
ZoomInfoChanged
One alternativeAdobe Analytics
Contentsquare, Quantum Metric
Four alternativesAmplitude, Fullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket
against: Microsoft Clarity
Pendo
Three alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, Quantum Metric
against: Clarity, Hotjar, Lucky Orange, Mouseflow
no first choiceagainst: Hotjar, Mouseflow, Userpilot
Grok 4.1 FastFullstory
Three alternativesContentsquare, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
FullstoryHeld
Three alternativesAdobe Analytics, Google Analytics 360, Heap
Fullstory
Four alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Microsoft Clarity
Four alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, LogRocket, PostHog
against: Hotjar, Smartlook
Contentsquare, Fullstory
Three alternativesLogRocket, OpenReplay, Quantum Metric
against: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, Smartlook
Mistral SmallHeap, Quantum Metric
Two alternativesFullstory, Smartlook
against: Microsoft Clarity
ZoomInfoChanged
Two alternatives11x, Hotjar
Contentsquare
Seven alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Quantum Metric
Glassbox
Two alternativesContentsquare, Quantum Metric
against: Datadog, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashFullstory
Three alternativesContentsquare, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
Adobe AnalyticsChanged
Two alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory
against: Google Analytics 360
Fullstory, Quantum Metric
Four alternativesAmplitude, Contentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Glassbox
One alternativeQuantum Metric
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory
Fullstory
Two alternativesLogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Mouseflow
against: Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Smartlook
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Qwen 3.7 FlashContentsquare
Three alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, Quantum Metric
FullstoryChanged
Three alternativesAlbacross, Hotjar, Knock Reveal
against: ZoomInfo
Fullstory
Three alternativesHotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Glassbox
One alternativePostHog
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory
Fullstory, LogRocketagainst: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarityagainst: Crazy Egg, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Kimi K2Fullstory
Three alternativesGlassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
ContentsquareChanged
Seven alternativesAdobe Analytics, Amplitude, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel, Optimizely CMS, VWO
Fullstory
Five alternativesAmplitude, Contentsquare, Glassbox, Pendo, Quantum Metric
against: LogRocket
Glassbox, Microsoft Clarity
One alternativeOpenReplay
against: Contentsquare, Datadog, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
Fullstory, OpenReplay, Quantum Metric
Three alternativesGlassbox, LogRocket, Pendo
against: Crazy Egg, Hotjar
against: Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, Inspectlet, Lucky Orange
GLM 4.7 FlashXQuantum Metric
Three alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, OpenReplay
ContentsquareChanged
Three alternativesFactors.ai, RB2B, ZoomInfo
Contentsquare, Fullstory, Glassbox
Two alternativesLogRocket, Mouseflow
against: Smartlook
PostHog
One alternativeLogRocket
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory
no first choiceagainst: Contentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
MiniMax M2.5Fullstory, Pendo
Two alternativesContentsquare, Mixpanel
DealfrontChanged
Four alternativesFullstory, Google Analytics 4, Hotjar, HubSpot
Quantum Metric
Six alternativesAmplitude, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
Microsoft Clarity
Five alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Glassbox, OpenReplay, Umami
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Clarityagainst: Hotjar
GPT-6 LunaFullstory
Two alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox
ContentsquareChanged
One alternativeFullstory
against: Microsoft Clarity
no first choiceMicrosoft Clarity
One alternativeLogRocket
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Clarity
Muse Glimmer 30BContentsquare, Fullstory
Two alternativesGlassbox, LogRocket
Contentsquare — Hotjar by ContentsquareChanged
Five alternatives6sense, Clearbit Reveal, Demandbase, Fullstory, Leadinfo
Fullstory
Six alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Quantum Metric
Glassbox
One alternativeMicrosoft Clarity
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory, Quantum Metric
no first choiceagainst: Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, Inspectlet, LogRocket, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, Smartlook
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 21:17yes158 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 21:23yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 21:19yes2129 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 21:36yes182 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 21:20yes2412 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 21:35yes127 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 21:34yes2135 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 21:37yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 21:21yes1434 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 21:24yes2425 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 21:27yes1518 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 21:20yes517 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 21:39yes414 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 21:32yes1225 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 21:21no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 21:31yes43 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 21:16yes2026 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 21:37yes202 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 21:37yes218 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 21:31yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 21:24yes2419 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 21:23yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 21:36yes1046 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 21:33yes1425 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 21:36yes1434 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 21:33yes544 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 21:35yes313 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 21:22yes1428 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 21:38yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 21:19yes510 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 21:33yes2427 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 21:18yes186 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 21:24yes2011 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 21:31yes1814 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 21:30yes2035 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 21:39yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 21:35yes1031 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 21:23yes2458 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 21:23yes2450 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 21:36yes514 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 21:17yes631 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 21:31yes2347 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 21:24yes158 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 21:35yes44 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 21:21yes1631 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 21:31yes153 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 21:26yes208 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 21:38yes85 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 21:24yes2118 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 21:36yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 21:40yes949 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 21:40yes2243 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 21:23yes2459 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 21:30yes2178 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 21:24yes320 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 21:20yes2225 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 21:22no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 21:34yes06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 21:19yes827 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 21:23yes187 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 21:31yes1712 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 21:18no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 21:38yes2483 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 21:37yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 21:27no026 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 21:32yes2260 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 21:39yes1525 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 21:33yes524 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 21:24yes428 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 21:24yes1521 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 21:27yes1815 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 21:35yes55 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 21:21yes1127 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 21:28yes174 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 21:18yes2211 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 21:24yes159 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 21:21yes2541 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 21:30yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 21:20yes1053 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 21:29yes2426 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 21:17yes2426 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 21:27yes1536 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 21:26yes334 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 21:26yes2542 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
None. Every name in this category resolved on its own.
Unresolved, counted raw
Amplitude Session Replay
Contentsquare — Hotjar by Contentsquare
Dealfront Leadfeeder
SessionCam
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Product analyticsTag management →