Every category where a model named Quantum Metric for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Session replay and heatmaps	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	53 of 56	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%
Product analytics	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	14 of 40	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Web analytics	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	34 of 91	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57%
Customer intelligence and data science	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	108 of 142	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quantum Metric yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quantum Metric across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.20	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels3

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative27 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained10 labels1

Negative14 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“enterprise solutions like Quantum Metric serve complex, high-scale environments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Product analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

“for AI/behavior, FullStory/Quantum Metric” Grok 4.20 · Web analytics · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Skip FullStory/Quantum Metric: While excellent, these tools are generally priced for large enterprises” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Session replay · direct prompt · hard negative

“Heavy enterprise pricing and complexity; overkill for most mid-market needs” Kimi K2 · Session replay · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quantum Metric, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantum Metric was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fullstory65 of 7714Not among the top eight

Contentsquare49 of 778Not among the top eight

Glassbox41 of 775Not among the top eight

LogRocket40 of 771Not among the top eight

Hotjar37 of 774Not among the top eight

Microsoft Clarity35 of 778Not among the top eight

PostHog27 of 771Not among the top eight

Mixpanel23 of 773Not among the top eight

Mouseflow23 of 770Not among the top eight

Amplitude18 of 770Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quantum Metric. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 77 answers that named Quantum Metric and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quantummetric.comYour site63

learn.g2.com35

amplitude.com32

pendo.io28

contentsquare.com24

fullstory.com24

userpilot.com24

g2.com22

koji.so20

guideflow.com18

227 of the 290 domain citations in answers naming Quantum Metric came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

quantummetric.com/blog/best-session-replay-tools-in-202636

quantummetric.com/blog/top-8-session-replay-tools-for-enterprises35

learn.g2.com/best-session-replay-software25

pendo.io/pendo-blog/the-top-6-session-replay-tools21

koji.so/blog/best-session-replay-tools-202619

userpilot.com/blog/session-replay-tools17

kanopylabs.com/blog/session-replay-vs-heatmaps-vs-product-analytics16

zapier.com/blog/best-session-replay-tools16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

quantummetric.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Quantum Metric takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Clarity takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “session replay and heatmap tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best session replay and heatmap tool”

Searches for its name, Google: 1,900 a month (“quantum metric”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 71 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 6,885 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,083 · 85 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,866
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

79 ads · 79 text · 48 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Quantum Metric, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 7 in the year, 72 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 53 of 56 in session replay

Segment leader

33%

Microsoft Clarity

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 77 answers
Its own site cited: in 77 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on quantummetric.com

876

subdomains included

Content

704

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

29 · 24

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	367	4	2026-08-24	Product analytics, Enrichment
Glossary or explainer	131	undated		Product analytics, Tag management
Conference or event	76	undated		Enrichment
Report or ebook	45	undated
Case study	34	undated
News or press	26	4	2026-09-18
Comparison	19	1	2026-07-29
Webinar or virtual event	5	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-18Quantum metric introduces ai agent visibility news or press
2026-09-16Quantum metric launches voice of customer news or press
2026-09-02Customer listening gap news or press
2026-08-24I connected friction data to a coding agent heres what happened blog
2026-08-10Responsible ai analytics blog
2026-07-29Mixpanel amplitude alternatives comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page quantummetric.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Quantum Metric

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quantum Metric; a claim can dispute any of them.

Quantum Metric / Glassbox 1

Follow Quantum Metric

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Quantum Metric is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Experience context for AI
quantummetric.com
For: teams and AI agents
quantummetric.com
Price stated: Pricing is based on a number of factors including your annual session volume, the digital properties where we are deployed, product add-ons and other things like the amount of professional services you’re looking for. quantummetric.com/pricing-plans
Certifications: comprehensive training and certification
Customers named: lululemonMasOrangeWyndham Hotels & ResortsBMOAmerican Medical AssociationWyndhamHighlights for ChildrenLarge Healthcare Provider
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Quantum Metric's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: quantummetric.com, quantummetric.com/pricing-plans, quantummetric.com/platform, quantummetric.com/customers, quantummetric.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quantum Metric's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quantum Metric, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Quantum Metric by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Quantum Metric is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Quantum Metric, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.