2 categories · RankedMouseflow
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 5% | 5 of 56 | 20% | 41 | accepted challenger | |
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 86 of 91 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57% |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Mouseflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Mouseflow if you want a simpler, usually cheaper tool that still covers both session replay and heatmaps well” GPT-5.4 mini · Session replay · direct prompt · first choice
“Mouseflow is widely cited as the best value for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Session replay · direct prompt · first choice
“My Top Recommendation: Mouseflow” Kimi K2 · Session replay · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Mouseflow is a solid mid-range option that covers session replay, heatmaps, form analytics, funnels, and surveys at a lower price point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Session replay · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Session replay tools in general (Hotjar, FullStory, Mouseflow, etc.) should be used with great caution. If you don't strictly need them, avoid them.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Web analytics · negative prompt · hard negative
“Similar recording patterns; part of the group facing CIPA (California Invasion of Privacy Act) complaints” Kimi K2 · Session replay · negative prompt · hard negative
“variable consent handling and sampling bias from opt-in requirements. EU scrutiny on replay depth.” Grok 4.20 · Session replay · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid or exercise extreme caution with Hotjar, FullStory, Mouseflow, LogRocket, and Smartlook” Mistral Small · Session replay · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Mouseflow, over the 103 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mouseflow was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 102 of the 103 answers that named Mouseflow and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
319 of the 367 domain citations in answers naming Mouseflow came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mouseflow.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Mouseflow takes 5% of first choices and Microsoft Clarity takes 33%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“mouseflow”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 18 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,202 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,656 · 131 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,764
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 103 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 102 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 188 | 12 | 2026-09-24 | SEO, Ecommerce marketing | |
| Comparison | 24 | 2 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| Case study | 21 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 16 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 3 | 2026-08-14 | ||
| News or press | 12 | 0 | 2026-03-06 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2026-03-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-07-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24How to optimize your customer experience for black friday and cyber monday blog
- 2026-09-22Ecommerce holiday readiness tips blog
- 2026-09-14Shopify heatmaps blog
- 2026-09-09Best heatmap tools blog
- 2026-08-28Zero click search conviction blog
- 2026-08-28Mina ai example prompts use cases blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mouseflow.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Mouseflow
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mouseflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mouseflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mouseflow by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Mouseflow is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mouseflow, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.