GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Crazy Egg · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Crazy Egg

15Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Crazy Egg was named 4 times in Customer intel and 1 other category, where Google Analytics 4 led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business50 of 151

under the label threshold

Mid-market57 of 158

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In customer intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Crazy Egg for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer intelligence and data science	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	57 of 158	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%
Experimentation and personalization	Marketing	0%	58 of 69	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by VWO at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Crazy Egg yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Crazy Egg across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“popular analytic platform for businesses that desire to optimize their website for conversion, with pricing starting at $20/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Customer intel · budget prompt · alternative

“Crazy Egg \u2014 low starting price and suitable for straightforward redirect tests” Perplexity Sonar · Experimentation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Crazy Egg no longer offer ongoing free plans — just 14–30 day trials” Kimi K2 · Experimentation · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Crazy Egg, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Crazy Egg was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

VWO11 of 152Not in the top three

GrowthBook9 of 153Not in the top three

PostHog8 of 151Not in the top three

Optimizely CMS8 of 150Not in the top three

Mida7 of 153Not in the top three

Adobe Target7 of 150Not in the top three

Statsig7 of 150Not in the top three

Dynamic Yield6 of 151Not in the top three

Convert Experiences5 of 152Not in the top three

Personizely5 of 151Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Crazy Egg. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 15 answers that named Crazy Egg and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vwo.com3

amplitude.com2

cometly.com2

convert.com2

cxl.com2

geteppo.com2

learn.g2.com2

mida.so2

optibase.io2

reddit.com2

Twenty-one of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming Crazy Egg came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplitude.com/compare/top-ab-testing-platforms2

convert.com/blog/a-b-testing/ab-testing-tools-for-growth-teams2

cxl.com/blog/ab-testing-tools2

geteppo.com/blog/best-ab-testing-tools2

learn.g2.com/best-a-b-testing-tools2

mida.so/blog/best-ab-testing-tools2

optibase.io/best-ab-testing-platforms2

statsig.com/comparison/best-experimentation-tools-marketers2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Crazy Egg's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Crazy Egg, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crazyegg.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.