AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Lucky Orange · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Lucky Orange

47Judge labels
3First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Session replay for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 56 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In session replay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lucky Orange for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Session replay and heatmapsGTM data and infrastructure3%8 of 560%7under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lucky Orange yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lucky Orange across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001102
Mistral Small20002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Lucky Orange and Hotjar are excellent starting points due to their ease of use and bundled features” Mistral Small · Session replay · direct prompt · first choice
“Lucky Orange starts at $18/month and includes both heatmaps and session recordings” Mistral Small · Session replay · budget prompt · first choice
“### 8. Lucky Orange - Best for Real-Time Insights” Kimi K2 · Session replay · comparative prompt · alternative
“Lucky Orange (Best Value for Small Business)” MiniMax M2.5 · Session replay · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lucky Orange, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lucky Orange was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Hotjar43 of 475Not among the top eight
Microsoft Clarity40 of 4733Not among the top eight
Mouseflow31 of 471Not among the top eight
Fullstory23 of 471Not among the top eight
PostHog20 of 473Not among the top eight
LogRocket18 of 470Not among the top eight
Crazy Egg16 of 470Not among the top eight
Contentsquare11 of 470Not among the top eight
Quantum Metric9 of 470Not among the top eight
Smartlook8 of 470Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lucky Orange. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named Lucky Orange and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zapier.com28
quantummetric.com26
learn.g2.com24
amplitude.com19
twipla.com17
userpilot.com17
contentsquare.com16
devopsschool.com14
plerdy.com14
g2.com13

188 of the 188 domain citations in answers naming Lucky Orange came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

luckyorange.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lucky Orange takes 3% of first choices and Microsoft Clarity takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “session replay and heatmap tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best session replay and heatmap tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,900 a month (“lucky orange”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
70 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,021 a month
Searches its site ranks for
757 · 60 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,476
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $2 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
69 ads · 53 text, 10 image, 6 video · 37 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Lucky Orange LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 30 in the year, 39 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 8 of 56 in session replay
Segment leader
33%
Microsoft Clarity
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
47 answers
Its own site cited
in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on luckyorange.com
500
subdomains included
Content
242
counted in the table below
Documentation
153
Product · Integration
0 · 14
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog15992026-09-29SEO
Comparison63572026-09-29
Case study1502026-03-02SEO
Template or tool202025-12-15
Glossary or explainer202026-04-06
Report or ebook102022-08-04

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page luckyorange.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Lucky Orange

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lucky Orange's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lucky Orange, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lucky Orange by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Lucky Orange is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lucky Orange, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at luckyorange.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.