AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › LogRocket · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

LogRocket

120Judge labels
3First choices
36Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Session replay for mid-market buyers
Rank 6 of 56 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 26% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LogRocket →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In session replay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LogRocket for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Session replay and heatmapsGTM data and infrastructure3%6 of 5626%42criticized challenger
Product analyticsGTM data and infrastructure0%36 of 4033%6under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LogRocket yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LogRocket across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash03115
Perplexity Sonar02114
Grok 4.1 Fast03014
Mistral Small00213
DeepSeek V4 Flash13026
Llama 4 Maverick00303
Qwen 3.7 Flash03115
Kimi K212014
GLM 4.7 FlashX02114
MiniMax M2.502013
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B01012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative36 labelsNone
Budget-constrained14 labelsNone
Scale-constrained20 labels3
Negative34 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative120 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The sweet spot is usually FullStory, Contentsquare, or LogRocket” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Session replay · scale prompt · first choice
“LogRocket — If engineering debugging is priority #1” Kimi K2 · Session replay · scale prompt · first choice
“FullStory / LogRocket: Industry standard for engineers/devs, deeper technical logging (network/XHR), slightly steeper learning curve.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Session replay · scale prompt · alternative
“tools with secure enterprise tiers that will sign a BAA (such as Datadog, Sentry, or LogRocket)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Session replay · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“avoid or exercise extreme caution with Hotjar, FullStory, Mouseflow, LogRocket, and Smartlook” Mistral Small · Session replay · negative prompt · hard negative
“early versions had PII exposure risks... litigation history warrants review” Grok 4.1 Fast · Session replay · negative prompt · hard negative
“reviews highlight that it only guarantees that passwords are never recorded. It does not automatically mask other sensitive information” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Session replay · negative prompt · soft negative
“LogRocket's state + network payload capture and FullStory's exhaustive autocapture are higher risk than DOM-only heatmaps.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Session replay · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LogRocket, over the 120 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LogRocket was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Glassbox40 of 1206Not among the top eight
Quantum Metric40 of 1205Not among the top eight
OpenReplay21 of 1202Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LogRocket. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 117 of the 120 answers that named LogRocket and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quantummetric.com69
learn.g2.com56
amplitude.com50
userpilot.com42
zapier.com38
contentsquare.com35
kanopylabs.com35
koji.so35
g2.com33
mouseflow.com33

426 of the 426 domain citations in answers naming LogRocket came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

logrocket.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, LogRocket takes 3% of first choices and Microsoft Clarity takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “session replay and heatmap tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best session replay and heatmap tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“logrocket”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
83 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 252,222 a month
Searches its site ranks for
57,148 · 1,436 in the top three
Sites linking to it
12,348
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
69 ads · 54 text, 12 image, 3 video · 11 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2022, as LogRocket, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 37 in the year, 32 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 6 of 56 in session replay
Segment leader
33%
Microsoft Clarity
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
120 answers
Its own site cited
in 117 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on logrocket.com
8,247
subdomains included
Content
6,647
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog5,990732026-09-28
Comparison366132026-09-28
Glossary or explainer16912026-09-09
Conference or event7322026-09-22
Case study3302025-09-04
Webinar or virtual event502023-03-02
Report or ebook402024-01-08
Template or tool402025-10-23
Podcast or video202021-03-08
News or press102025-08-29
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page logrocket.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow LogRocket

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

LogRocket is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI session replay that catches issues before your users do
Price stated
Access all of LogRocket's features free for 14 days. Cancel any time. logrocket.com
Free plan or trial
Start for free logrocket.com
Customers named
7-ElevenAppfireBlue Cross Blue Shield of MassachusettsCox AutomotivethredUPTecovas
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What LogRocket's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: logrocket.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LogRocket's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LogRocket, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LogRocket by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where LogRocket is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name LogRocket, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at logrocket.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.