| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 15 of 142 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 32 of 56 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33% | |
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 26 of 91 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57% | |
| Product analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 19 of 40 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intel | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 146 → 15 of 142 |
| Session replay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 56, unchanged |
| Web analytics | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 91, unchanged |
| Product analytics | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 19 of 40 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Glassbox and Improvado are top choices due to their ease of implementation and comprehensive analytics” Mistral Small · Customer intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lokker or Glassbox: Strong default masking, GDPR tools (EU hosting, HIPAA options).” Grok 4.20 · Session replay · negative prompt · first choice
“For deeper UX and customer journey insights, consider Contentsquare or Glassbox.” Mistral Small · Web analytics · direct prompt · alternative
“FullStory and Glassbox excel at session replay and visual debugging.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Product analytics · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise-grade with premium pricing” Kimi K2 · Session replay · direct prompt · hard negative
“Don't infer safety from the product name or a "privacy" feature.” GPT-6 Luna · Session replay · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 75 answers that named Glassbox and are not a share of its labels.
270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Glassbox came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 262 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | Mobile apps | |
| News or press | 121 | 2 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Case study | 19 | 0 | 2022-11-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 19 | 4 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2025-07-21 | Product analytics | |
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2025-10-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Every page glassbox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Glassbox's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: glassbox.com, glassbox.com, trust.glassbox.com, glassbox.com/platform, glassbox.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Glassbox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Glassbox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Glassbox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: