AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Glassbox · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Glassbox

75Judge labels
7First choices
9Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in Session replay for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 142 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In customer intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Glassbox for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Customer intelligence and data scienceGTM data and infrastructure2%15 of 1420%6under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Session replay and heatmapsGTM data and infrastructure0%32 of 5629%7under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%
Web analyticsGTM data and infrastructure0%26 of 910%4under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57%
Product analyticsGTM data and infrastructure0%19 of 400%1under 10 labels · led by Amplitude Analytics at 34%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Glassbox held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Customer intel · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 68 of 115, unchanged
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 146 → 14 of 133
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 49 of 134

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Customer intel0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 146 → 15 of 142
Session replay0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 32 of 56, unchanged
Web analytics0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 26 of 91, unchanged
Product analytics0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 28 → 19 of 40

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Glassbox across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501102
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2010203
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01304
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200213
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative23 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels6
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative14 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative75 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Glassbox and Improvado are top choices due to their ease of implementation and comprehensive analytics” Mistral Small · Customer intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Lokker or Glassbox: Strong default masking, GDPR tools (EU hosting, HIPAA options).” Grok 4.20 · Session replay · negative prompt · first choice
“For deeper UX and customer journey insights, consider Contentsquare or Glassbox.” Mistral Small · Web analytics · direct prompt · alternative
“FullStory and Glassbox excel at session replay and visual debugging.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Product analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise-grade with premium pricing” Kimi K2 · Session replay · direct prompt · hard negative
“Don't infer safety from the product name or a "privacy" feature.” GPT-6 Luna · Session replay · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Glassbox, over the 75 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Glassbox was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Fullstory61 of 7515Not among the top eight
Contentsquare53 of 7511Not among the top eight
Quantum Metric41 of 755Not among the top eight
LogRocket40 of 750Not among the top eight
Hotjar39 of 752Not among the top eight
Microsoft Clarity29 of 757Not among the top eight
Amplitude23 of 753Not among the top eight
Mouseflow22 of 751Not among the top eight
PostHog22 of 751Not among the top eight
Mixpanel17 of 753Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Glassbox. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 75 answers that named Glassbox and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quantummetric.com49
learn.g2.com30
pendo.io28
amplitude.com27
contentsquare.com27
fullstory.com25
userpilot.com24
g2.com22
koji.so21
kanopylabs.com17

270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Glassbox came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

glassbox.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Glassbox takes 2% of first choices and Amplitude takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “customer analytics and intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer analytics and intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
6,600 a month (“glassbox”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
161 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 9,082 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,268 · 97 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,207
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
14 ads · 14 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2025, as Glassbox Digital UK LTD., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 12 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 142 in customer intel
Segment leader
18%
Amplitude
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
75 answers
Its own site cited
in 75 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on glassbox.com
569
subdomains included
Content
439
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
36 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog26212026-09-03Mobile apps
News or press12122026-09-09
Case study1902022-11-11
Conference or event1942026-09-15
Comparison1002025-07-21Product analytics
Glossary or explainer602025-10-22
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Template or tool1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page glassbox.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Glassbox

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Glassbox; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quantum Metric / Glassbox 1

Follow Glassbox

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Glassbox Ltd is the company behind Glassbox.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Petah Tikva, Israel
Founded
2010
Ownership
Public, GLBX on Tel Aviv Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Glassbox provides digital customer experience analytics for web and mobile apps. Drive revenue, profitability & loyalty with optimized digital CX.
For
highly regulated enterprises
Certifications
Solutions Partner with certified software designation for financial services AI within the Microsoft AI Cloud Partner ProgramG2 Leader Summer 2025ISO 27001:2022ISO 27701:2025ISO 27017ISO/IEC 42001:2023SOC 2CSA STAR LEVEL-1
Hosting
Ireland (EU)Northern Virginia(USA)SingaporeNorthern Virginia (USA)AWS (USA)
Customers named
SoFiSainsbury'sMarriottPurinaNBrownBank LeumiNestléAn Post Insurance
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Glassbox's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: glassbox.com, glassbox.com, trust.glassbox.com, glassbox.com/platform, glassbox.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Glassbox's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Glassbox, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Glassbox by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Glassbox is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Glassbox, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at glassbox.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.