Every category where a model named OpenReplay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Session replay and heatmaps	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	19 of 56	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OpenReplay yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OpenReplay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2
Grok 4.20	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative11 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look for tools that offer self-hosting (on-premise) or warehouse-native deployments (such as OpenReplay, PostHog, or Statsig” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Session replay · negative prompt · alternative

“notable for being self-hosted, which matters if you need more control over data and deployment” Perplexity Sonar · Session replay · comparative prompt · alternative

“PostHog (self-hosted) or OpenReplay are excellent open-source alternatives” Kimi K2 · Session replay · budget prompt · alternative

“OpenReplay | Self-hosted/developer teams | Full control over data” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Session replay · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OpenReplay, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OpenReplay was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Fullstory25 of 307Not among the top eight

Hotjar24 of 302Not among the top eight

Microsoft Clarity22 of 308Not among the top eight

LogRocket21 of 301Not among the top eight

PostHog18 of 300Not among the top eight

Contentsquare16 of 303Not among the top eight

Glassbox16 of 303Not among the top eight

Quantum Metric13 of 302Not among the top eight

Mouseflow12 of 300Not among the top eight

Crazy Egg6 of 300Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OpenReplay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 30 answers that named OpenReplay and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quantummetric.com22

userpilot.com14

pendo.io13

amplitude.com11

lokker.com11

zapier.com11

learn.g2.com10

motadata.com10

openreplay.comYour site10

betterstack.com9

111 of the 121 domain citations in answers naming OpenReplay came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

quantummetric.com/blog/best-session-replay-tools-in-202615

pendo.io/pendo-blog/the-top-6-session-replay-tools13

quantummetric.com/blog/top-8-session-replay-tools-for-enterprises13

zapier.com/blog/best-session-replay-tools11

lokker.com/compare/session-replay-tools10

motadata.com/blog/best-session-replay-software10

userpilot.com/blog/session-replay-tools10

betterstack.com/community/comparisons/session-replay-alternatives9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

openreplay.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, OpenReplay takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Clarity takes 33%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “session replay and heatmap tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best session replay and heatmap tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 590 a month (“openreplay”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 185,076 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 18,971 · 648 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,538
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 19 of 56 in session replay

Segment leader

33%

Microsoft Clarity

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 30 answers
Its own site cited: in 30 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on openreplay.com

10,242

subdomains included

Content

2,750

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

40 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	2,246	95	2026-09-29	SEO, Ecommerce
Template or tool	211	undated
Comparison	167	11	2026-09-20	Mobile apps
Conference or event	118	0	2025-11-01
Glossary or explainer	6	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated
Report or ebook	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29First look astryx meta design system blog
2026-09-29Read javascript stack trace blog
2026-09-28Custom hono middleware blog
2026-09-28Vue vapor mode blog
2026-09-27Using npm packages browser blog
2026-09-27Wp cli terminal users blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page openreplay.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow OpenReplay

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OpenReplay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OpenReplay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OpenReplay by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where OpenReplay is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name OpenReplay, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.