Session replay and heatmaps · October 2026 Edition
Mouseflow vs Contentsquare
Two of fourteen models named Mouseflow first on the direct prompt; one named Contentsquare. Mouseflow was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Contentsquare by twelve and Mouseflow carries 41 labels and Contentsquare 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Paris, France, founded 2008. Named in six categories this edition.
First-choice share5%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4121A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Mouseflow reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Hotjar was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Clarity vs Mouseflow · Microsoft Clarity vs Contentsquare · Hotjar vs Mouseflow
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the session replay and heatmaps page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MouseflowFirst choices, of fourteen modelsContentsquare
Direct212 against Contentsquare
Paraphrase10
Comparative011 against Mouseflow
Budget-constrained001 against Mouseflow · 1 against Contentsquare
Scale-constrained01
Negative006 against Mouseflow
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Mouseflow and Contentsquare stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Mouseflow Contentsquare first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mouseflow on the left and Contentsquare on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Mouseflow and Contentsquare stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.GPT-5.4 miniContentsquare, Mouseflow alternatives: LogRocket
Mouseflow first, Contentsquare not the choice
1 of 14 modelsContentsquare was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Mouseflow alternatives: Hotjar
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashPendo alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow, PostHog
Grok 4.1 FastHotjar alternatives: LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
DeepSeek V4 FlashPostHog alternatives: Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Kimi K2Hotjar alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow, Smartlook
GLM 4.7 FlashXHotjar alternatives: Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Heap, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog, VWO
Neither was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarFullstory alternatives: Hotjar, LogRocket
Mistral SmallHotjar, Lucky Orange alternatives: Fullstory, PostHog, UXCam
Llama 4 MaverickSmartlook alternatives: Adobe Analytics, Fullstory
Qwen 3.7 FlashHotjar alternatives: LogRocket, Matomo
MiniMax M2.5Mixpanel alternatives: Fullstory, PostHog, UXCam
GPT-6 LunaPostHog alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mouseflow leads by two points.
Mouseflow2%#3 of 10Contentsquare0%#9 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
Mouseflow leads by two points.
Mouseflow5%#5 of 10Contentsquare3%#7 of 10Enterprise
The order flips: Contentsquare leads at enterprise.
Contentsquare19%#2 of 12Mouseflow0%#12 of 12What the models said about Mouseflow
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Similar recording patterns; part of the group facing CIPA (California Invasion of Privacy Act) complaints” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“variable consent handling and sampling bias from opt-in requirements. EU scrutiny on replay depth.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid or exercise extreme caution with Hotjar, FullStory, Mouseflow, LogRocket, and Smartlook” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Mouseflow if you want a simpler, usually cheaper tool that still covers both session replay and heatmaps well” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Mouseflow is widely cited as the best value for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“My Top Recommendation: Mouseflow” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Contentsquare
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Heavy enterprise pricing and complexity; overkill for most mid-market needs” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“enterprise tools only if you need deeper product analytics, governance, or enterprise workflows, because they're generally much more expensive” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“without paying the $50k+ annual contract values required by enterprise-only suites (like FullStory or Contentsquare)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“my default recommendation is Contentsquare if you want the most complete, scalable experience-analytics platform” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Go with FullStory or Contentsquare for deep session replay and journey analytics.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“The sweet spot is usually FullStory, Contentsquare, or LogRocket” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Also compared
Microsoft Clarity vs MouseflowMicrosoft Clarity vs ContentsquareHotjar vs MouseflowHotjar vs ContentsquareFullstory vs MouseflowFullstory vs ContentsquarePostHog vs MouseflowPostHog vs ContentsquareMouseflow vs LogRocketMouseflow vs SmartlookLogRocket vs ContentsquareContentsquare vs SmartlookAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full session replay standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.