AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › GTM data and infrastructure › October 2026 Edition

Workflow automation and iPaaS

Asked as “workflow automation and integration platform”, and as “iPaaS”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · Make 21%
28Workato21Make12Celigo40others

28% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026▼−13Since September 2026: 38% → 25%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Workato held the lead, −13 points on 38%, past the floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Workato28%14%56accepted challenger▼−13Since September 2026: 38% → 25%, −13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.38% → 25%
02Make21%11%55accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 17% → 21%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 21%
03Celigo12%0%18accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 12% → 15%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 15%
04n8n9%21%48accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 12% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 8%
05Boomi9%10%30accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 8%
06Zapier5%35%66criticized challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 6%
07Tray.ai5%21%19accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 4% → 6%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 6%
08Pabbly Connect2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
09Activepieces2%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11MuleSoft Anypoint Platform0%48%23criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Microsoft Power Automate0%15%40accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Workato28%
02Make21%
03Celigo12%
04n8n9%
05Boomi9%
06Zapier5%
07Tray.ai5%
08Pabbly Connect2%
09Activepieces2%
10Microsoft Power Automate0%
11MuleSoft Anypoint Platform0%

What they warned about

Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zapier
35%
23 of 66 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“lacks the governance, error-handling, and scalability needed for core B2B operations... Use for ad-hoc automations, not your backbone.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt
n8n
21%
10 of 48 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Critical vulnerabilities**: Multiple CVEs (CVE-2026-27577, CVE-2026-27493) with CVSS scores of 9.4-9.5” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
48%
11 of 23 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“**Why to Avoid:** They are notoriously difficult to implement, expensive to license, and require certified administrators” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Workato
14%
8 of 56 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Caution points are cost and complexity... Overkill for small teams; licensing and implementation costs can be high relative to simpler needs.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1024 links across 330 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · ONES.com30 answers · 56 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Zapier17 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Rework17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · n8n15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Viasocket14 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Reply.io13 answers · 13 citations · 10 models
12 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Atlassian12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workflow automation and integration platform”, “workflow automation and integration platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Workato workato.com28%14814,80040538,042$20120
Make make.com21%156135,00012,939,045439,03176
Celigo celigo.com12%445,4001409,670$1,09743
n8n n8n.io9%121165,0002,786133,59942
Boomi boomi.com9%7312,10073219,837$22,810120
Zapier zapier.com5%213165,0002,1457,333,309$230120
Tray.ai tray.ai5%4239074,110$971
Pabbly Connect pabbly.com2%231,300203,5881
Activepieces activepieces.com2%232,4001314,532
AdRoll ABM adroll.com2%214110052,27318

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best workflow automation and integration platform” is useparagon.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which iPaaS would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top workflow automation and integration platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a workflow automation and integration platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workflow automation and integration platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceBoomiChanged
Two alternativesCeligo, Workato
no first choice
Four alternativesMake, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Make
Three alternativesActivepieces, Zapier, n8n
no first choiceagainst: Cflow, Kissflow, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, ProcessMaker, Zapier, n8n
GPT-5.4 miniWorkato
Four alternativesBoomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier
BoomiChanged
Two alternativesAzure Logic Apps, Workato
no first choiceZapier, n8n
One alternativeMake
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCeligo
Four alternativesMake, Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier
CeligoHeld
Three alternativesBoomi, Tray.ai, Workato
against: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
no first choice
Six alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Make
Four alternativesActivepieces, Microsoft Power Automate, Pabbly Connect, n8n
against: Zapier
Workato
Three alternativesCeligo, Make, n8n
against: Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier
against: Activepieces, Boomi, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, TIBCO, Tray.ai, Windmill, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Perplexity SonarWorkato
Three alternativesHubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Zapier
WorkatoHeld
Four alternativesBoomi, Celigo, Prismatic, n8n
Zapier
Six alternativesCamunda, Kissflow, Make, Temporal, Workato, n8n
against: Asana, ClickUp, Smartsheet, Wrike
Make
Two alternativesClickUp, Zapier
no first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Relay.app, Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Grok 4.1 FastWorkato
Five alternativesBoomi, Celigo, Make, Tray.ai, Zapier
WorkatoHeld
Three alternativesBoomi, Celigo, Zapier
against: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Zapier
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Workato, n8n
n8n
Five alternativesActivepieces, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Pabbly Connect, Zapier
Tray.ai, Workatoagainst: Airtable, Bubble, IFTTT, Zapier, n8n
Mistral SmallWorkato
Three alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Jitterbit Harmony, Microsoft Power Automate
Celigo, WorkatoChanged
Three alternativesJitterbit Harmony, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Zapier
Make, Zapier
Five alternativesBoomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.ai, Workato, n8n
ClickUp, Pabbly Connect
Two alternativesONES.com, Relay.app
no first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power Automate, OpenAI Agent Builder, Relay.app, UiPath, n8n
DeepSeek V4 FlashCeligo, Workato
Two alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate
against: Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier
CeligoChanged
Two alternativesBoomi, Workato
no first choice
Eight alternativesActivepieces, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, UiPath, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Make, n8n
Three alternativesIFTTT, Microsoft Power Automate, Pabbly Connect
against: Workato, Zapier
Tray.ai, Workatoagainst: Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Zapieragainst: IFTTT, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
Llama 4 MaverickAdRoll ABM
Two alternativesBoomi, Celigo's integrator.io
no first choiceChanged
Three alternativesBoomi, Celigo, Workato
no first choiceZapier
Four alternativesKissflow, Make, Zoho Flow, n8n
no first choiceagainst: Workato, Zapier, n8n
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkato
Three alternativesJitterbit Harmony, Make, Microsoft Power Automate
Tray.aiChanged
Three alternativesCeligo, Make, Workato
against: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier
Workato, Zapier
Seven alternativesAutomation Anywhere, Boomi, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, UiPath, n8n
Make
Four alternativesActivepieces, Microsoft Power Automate, Pabbly Connect, n8n
against: Zapier
no first choiceagainst: Zapieragainst: Excel Macros, Google AppScript, IFTTT, Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Oracle SOA Suite, Pega, Retool, Zapier
Kimi K2Make
Two alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, Zapier
against: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.ai, Workato
CeligoChanged
Three alternativesBoomi, Jitterbit Harmony, Workato
Zapier
Six alternativesBoomi, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Workato, n8n
Make, n8n
Two alternativesActivepieces, Pabbly Connect
against: Zapier
no first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier
GLM 4.7 FlashXMake
Two alternativesZapier, n8n
against: Workato
Boomi, CeligoChanged
One alternativeWorkato
against: Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Zapier
no first choiceMake
Five alternativesActivepieces, Microsoft Power Automate, Pabbly Connect, Zoho Flow, n8n
no first choiceagainst: IFTTT, Zapier, n8n
MiniMax M2.5Make, Zapier
One alternativeWorkato
BoomiChanged
One alternativeWorkato
against: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Zapier
Five alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Workato, n8n
Cflow, Integrately
Two alternativesMonday.com, UiPath
no first choiceagainst: Zapier, n8n
GPT-6 LunaWorkato
Three alternativesBoomi, Make, Microsoft Power Automate
BoomiChanged
Three alternativesCeligo, Jitterbit Harmony, Workato
Zapier
Eight alternativesAzure Logic Apps, Boomi, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Pipedream, Workato, n8n
Make
Three alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
no first choiceagainst: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
Muse Glimmer 30BCeligo integrator.io, WorkatoWorkatoChanged
Two alternativesCeligo, Dell Boomi
Zapier
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Workato, n8n
Activepieces, Make, n8n
One alternativePabbly Connect
against: Zapier
Workato
Seven alternativesBoomi, Celigo, Make, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, SnapLogic, Zapier, n8n
against: Make.com formerly Integromat, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:40no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:34yes56 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:45yes1530 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:52yes193 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:04yes259 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:32yes1215 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:26yes2542 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:39yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:44yes1038 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:57yes1323 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:24yes2574 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:22no08 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:09yes414 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:24yes2247 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:22yes99 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:42yes14 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:18yes1632 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:52yes173 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:44yes237 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:18yes620 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:31yes2023 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:33yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:13no029 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:11yes1923 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:06yes1623 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:15yes1025 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:26yes415 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:22yes1522 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:36yes107 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:34yes68 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:12yes1425 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:08yes206 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:49yes2310 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:09yes1110 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:55yes2055 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:09yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:58no033 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:53yes1429 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:47yes2367 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:39yes2334 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:28yes926 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:37yes1539 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:15yes1810 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:59yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 14:06yes920 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:44yes214 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:45yes2510 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:09yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:10yes2032 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:09yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:42yes1043 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:17yes1521 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 08:48yes1439 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:53yes512 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:02yes413 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:24yes1519 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:33no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:31yes412 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:47yes1027 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 14:03yes194 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:01yes1510 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:20no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:20yes2029 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:54yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 14:02no035 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:21yes1519 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:14no09 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:11yes512 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:25yes220 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:56yes1420 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:14yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:53yes17 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:38yes1122 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:17yes204 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:36yes257 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:40yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:41yes2523 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:39yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:27no032 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:14yes2528 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:52yes2428 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:33yes2428 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 07:56yes433 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:34yes2530 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Operations Hub
Informatica read as Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services
Jitterbit read as Jitterbit Harmony
Jitterbit (now Postman) read as Jitterbit Harmony
MuleSoft read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Anypoint) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Salesforce) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Oracle read as Oracle Integration Cloud
SAP read as SAP Integration Suite
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Flow Designer
Unresolved, counted raw
Bubble
Celigo integrator.io
Celigo's integrator.io
Excel Macros (VBA)
Google AppScript
Kestra
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
OpenAI Agent Builder
Oracle SOA Suite
Windmill
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Web analyticsAffiliate →