Three of twelve models named Make first on the direct prompt; zero named Pabbly Connect. Make was named by twelve of the twelve models and Pabbly Connect by eight and Make carries 48 labels and Pabbly Connect 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Make and Pabbly Connect were named in the same answer twenty-two times, of the 151 answers naming Make and the 24 naming Pabbly Connect. In those answers Pabbly Connect took the first choice zero times and Make sixteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“powerful and often better value, but it is still best suited to app-to-app automation; if you need strong governance ... it may not be the right fit” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“only for lightweight, low-volume, non-critical automations; they're not designed for complex, high-volume B2B data integration” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Strong value for mid-complexity workflows... Avoid for long-running processes or data-sensitive industries.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Make if you are cost-conscious, manage complex agency workflows, or need to process hundreds of records at once cheaply.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Complex Logic on a Budget | Make | Allows loops, deep branching, and data arrays at a fraction of Zapier's cost.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“4. Make (Best Value) ... For most small businesses with limited budgets, Make or n8n offer the best balance” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Not recommended for production workflows.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Smaller connector library (~1,000 apps vs. 7,000+ for Zapier)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pabbly Connect is the value king with free triggers, no feature gating across plans, and a $349 lifetime deal” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Pabbly Connect provides unlimited workflows starting at around $13.48 per month” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for High Volume ... Lifetime deal eliminates ongoing subscription worries” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.